The world economy is experiencing a turbulent start this year. Stock markets are plummeting; emerging economies are reeling in response to the sharp decline in commodities prices; refugee inflows are further destabilizing Europe; China’s growth has slowed markedly in response to a capital-flow reversal and an overvalued currency; and the US is in political paralysis. A few central bankers struggle to keep the world economy upright.
To escape this mess, four principles should guide the way. First, international economic progress depends on high international saving and investment. Second, saving and investment flows should be viewed as international, not national. Third, full employment depends on high investment rates that match high saving rates. Fourth, high private investments by businesses depend on high public investments in infrastructure and human capital. Let us consider each.
First, the international community’s goal should be economic progress, meaning better living conditions worldwide. Indeed, that goal has been enshrined in the new Sustainable Development Goals adopted in September last year by all 193 members of the UN.
Progress depends on a high rate of international investment: Building the skills, technology and physical capital stock to propel standards of living higher. In economic development, as in life, there is no free lunch: Without high rates of investment in know-how, skills, machinery and sustainable infrastructure, productivity tends to decline (mainly through depreciation), dragging down living standards.
High investment rates in turn depend on high saving rates. A famous psychological experiment found that young children who could resist the immediate temptation to eat a marshmallow, and thereby gain two marshmallows in the future, were likelier to thrive as adults than those who could not.
Likewise, societies that defer instant consumption in order to save and invest for the future are expected to enjoy higher future incomes and greater retirement security. When US economists advise China to boost consumption and cut saving, they are merely peddling the bad habits of US culture, which saves and invests far too little for the US’ future.
Second, saving and investment flows are international. A nation, such as China, with a high saving rate that exceeds local investment needs, can support investment in other parts of the world that save less, notably low-income Africa and Asia.
China’s population is aging rapidly and Chinese households are saving for retirement. The Chinese know that their household financial assets, rather than numerous children or government social security, is likely be the main source of their financial security.
Low-income Africa and Asia, on the other hand, are both capital-poor and very young. They can borrow from China’s high savers to finance a massive and rapid buildup of education, skills and infrastructure to underpin their own future economic prosperity.
Third, a high international saving rate does not automatically translate into a high investment rate; unless properly directed, it can cause underspending and unemployment instead.
Money put into banks and other financial intermediaries (such as pension and insurance funds) can finance productive activities or short-term speculation; for example, consumer loans and real estate.
Great bankers of the past like J.P. Morgan built industries like rail and steel. Today’s money managers, by contrast, tend to resemble gamblers or even fraudsters, like Charles Ponzi.
Fourth, today’s investments with high social returns — such as low-carbon energy, smart power grids for cities and information-based health systems — depend on public-private partnerships, in which public investment and public policies help to spur private investment.
This has long been the case: Railroad networks, aviation, automobiles, semiconductors, satellites, GPS, hydraulic fracturing, nuclear power, genomics and the Internet would not exist, but for such partnerships — typically, but not only, starting with the military.
The global problem today is that the world’s financial intermediaries are not properly steering long-term saving into long-term investments. The problem is compounded by the fact that most governments (the US is a stark case) are chronically underinvesting in long-term education, skill training and infrastructure.
Private investment is falling short mainly because of the shortfall of complementary public investment. Shortsighted macroeconomists say the world is underconsuming; in fact, it is underinvesting.
The result is inadequate international demand (international investments falling short of international saving at full employment) and highly volatile short-term capital flows to finance consumption and real estate.
Such short-term flows are subject to abrupt reversals of size and direction. The 1997 Asian financial crisis followed a sudden stop of capital inflows to Asia and international short-term lending suddenly dried up after Lehman Brothers collapsed in September 2008, causing the Great Recession. Now China is facing the same problem, with inflows having abruptly given way to outflows.
The mainstream macroeconomic advice to China — boost domestic consumption and overvalue the yuan to cut exports — fails the marshmallow test. It encourages overconsumption, underinvestment and rising unemployment in a rapidly aging society, and in a world that can make tremendous use of China’s high saving and industrial capacity.
The right policy is to channel China’s high saving to increased investment in infrastructure and skills in low-income Africa and Asia. China’s new Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and its “One Belt, One Road” initiative to establish modern transport and communications links throughout the region are steps in the right direction.
These programs would keep China’s factories operating at high capacity to produce the investment goods needed for rapid growth in today’s low-income nations. China’s currency should be allowed to depreciate so that China’s capital goods exports to Africa and Asia are more affordable.
More generally, governments should expand the role of national and multilateral development banks (including the regional development banks for Asia, Africa, the Americas and Muslim nations) to channel long-term saving from pension funds, insurance funds and commercial banks into long-term public and private investments in 21st century industries and infrastructure.
Central banks and hedge funds cannot produce long-term economic growth and financial stability. Only long-term investments, both public and private, can lift the world economy out of its current instability and slow growth.
Jeffrey Sachs is a professor of sustainable development, professor of health policy and management and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry