It is a blot on the face of humanity that we have yet to eradicate slavery — of children, no less. Not only does child slavery persist; the number of child slaves, 5.5 million, has remained constant in the last two decades. They are bought and sold like animals, sometimes for less than a pack of cigarettes. Add to their number the 168 million child workers, 59 million out-of-school children and 15 million girls under 15 who are forced to marry every year, and the situation is beyond unacceptable.
Eighteen years ago, the Global March Against Child Labour spearheaded a global movement to bring child labor and child slavery to the attention of global leaders. Thanks to the invaluable contribution of fellow activists, workers, educators and businesses, the campaign was a resounding success, leading to the adoption of the International Labor Organization’s Worst Forms of Child Labor Convention.
However, there is clearly much work left to do. That is why the Global March Against Child Labour worked so hard — collecting 550,000 signatures on a petition — to push world leaders to include strong language against child slavery in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), which is to guide global development efforts for the next 15 years. Among the SDG targets is one that aims to “eradicate forced labor, end modern slavery and human trafficking, and secure the prohibition and elimination of the worst forms of child labor.”
However, now it is time to back that promise — one of 169 targets — with concerted action. After all, if child labor, slavery, human trafficking and violence against children continue, we would have failed to accomplish the agenda’s overarching goal of achieving inclusive and sustainable prosperity. And the responsibility does not lie only with governments; businesses, civil society and individual citizens must all contribute, not least by pressuring their leaders to make a change.
Consider the situation in India, where impending revisions to two major development policies — the National Education Policy and the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act — are heading in opposite directions. On the one hand, a new education policy has the potential to address child labor as a barrier to education and, more broadly, to improve the life prospects of millions of marginalized and deprived children. On the other hand, the proposed amendments to the Child Labour Act would erect new barriers to further progress on education.
Specifically, the changes to the Child Labour Act would allow children under the age of 14 to help their families in “non-hazardous” family enterprises or the entertainment industry. This may sound innocuous, but it fails to acknowledge a stark and undisputable reality: Work for “family enterprises” can be as brutal as any other kind. And the list of “hazardous” occupations is far from complete.
Before being rescued by my organization, Bachpan Bachao Andolan, eight-year-old Arpita was forced to work 16 to 18 hour days in the home of her uncle as domestic “help.” When we rescued her, we had to break down the door. It was the dead of winter, and she was barely clothed and severely malnourished, covered in wounds, and cowering under a rag on her uncle’s balcony.
Likewise, when we rescued 10-year-old Mohsin and eight-year-old Aslam in 2007 from a sweatshop — owned by their uncle — where they made children’s clothing for one of world’s largest garment retailers, they were starving. The jobs performed by Arpita, Mohsin, and Aslam would not be considered “hazardous” under the amended act.
In a recent analysis, we found that one-fifth of the children under age 14 rescued by Bachpan Bachao Andolan were working in family enterprises. More than 40 percent of the rescued children were performing hazardous jobs — for example, working in roadside restaurants (dhabas) or manufacturing garments, leather goods, cosmetics, or electronics — that would be allowed under the amended act.
There are millions of enslaved Arpitas, Mohsins, and Aslams. However, if the proposed amendments are adopted, we would not be able to rescue a single child under 14 years of age who is employed by his or her “family” — no matter how vile the conditions of their servitude. The impact — not just on individual children, but also on the future of our society — would be devastating. On behalf of India’s children, we call upon the Indian parliament to do the right thing and reject the proposed amendments to the Child Labour Act.
Beyond India, the imperative to protect children is just as strong. If we are to realize the future promised in the SDGs, surely we must do everything in our power to protect the fundamental human rights of every person, especially the most vulnerable. That is why governments worldwide must deepen their commitment to pursuing child-friendly policies and investing in the protection and education of their young people.
My colleagues and I have humbly done our part over the years, rescuing more than 84,000 children from despicable conditions. It has not been enough to end the blight of child slavery, but to those children and their families, it has meant everything.
Still, far too many children remain enslaved, missing out not just on their childhood, but also on the chance for a happy, healthy and prosperous future. It is time for the world to stand up and lend its voice to those whose cannot. We must demand that our leaders fulfill their promise of ensuring that every child’s life is free from exploitation, enriched by education and full of promise. Our generation can and should be the one that ends child slavery forever.
Kailash Satyarthi is a children’s rights activist in India and co-winner of last year’s Nobel Peace Prize.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under