Just a few decades ago, the buzz was all about “off-shoring” — where manufacturing moved to cheaper cost bases, such as China or Latin America.
Then came something of a reversal with “near-shoring” — of companies returning production closer to home markets, such as the US, as the price of fuel and labor rose elsewhere.
However, in today’s globally connected economies, it is about much more than just cost. Now, the balance of manufacturing is shifting — yet again.
Next-shoring — not moving manufacturing from one location to another, but “adapting to, and preparing for, the changing nature of manufacturing everywhere” is the new frontier, as a recent McKinsey report said.
The difference is that today’s revolutionary shift is not a matter of geography, nor is it a competition between countries or continents.
It is a trend to something much greater and far more complicated — a trend of shifting mindsets, of access to innovative manufacturing techniques, of thinking beyond the basic numbers and coming up with the most efficient supply chains.
It is about how companies need to look at the big picture to make better business decisions.
As FedEx transports by air, land and sea, it bears witness to the global trends affecting all kinds of industries.
FedEx has seen a growing trend in its own business toward the greater use of ocean as part of its shipment solutions, not just the air express it pioneered and is known for.
Across the 220 nations and territories it operates in, it has also witnessed underlying shifts in global wages, purchasing power and energy costs.
So, where to set up a manufacturing base is no longer a straightforward calculation for many companies.
Within Asia, manufacturing is shifting to central and western China, to Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia. Centers of expertise are also important. At the same time, China is no longer just a factory floor — it has moved from the origin to the center of the supply chain.
Intra-regional trade with China is booming — it now accounts for 37 percent of ASEAN’s total trade — with the intra-Asia trade corridor today acknowledged as the fastest growing in the world. In Taiwan, exports to China reached about US$82 billion in 2014, increasing by 130 times from US$623 million in 1996, and China has become one of Taiwan’s top-five export destinations since 2001.
Emerging markets as a whole are forecast to grab a 66 percent share of global demand by 2025.
So, for some industries, it can make more sense to keep production in emerging markets in Asia, rather than the US or Mexico, so they are near the huge consumer markets of China and India.
Yet Canada and Mexico can still be seen as attractive options for manufacturing for the same reason — their closeness to the vast market that is the US — and the accompanying advantages of the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Some companies want close language and cultural connections to the place they set up factories; others want control over their business that only proximity can provide.
Crossing borders is also an obstacle for some; though it does not have to be. FedEx works with countless customers to expedite customs clearance and ensure import/export rules and regulations do not impact their operations, even if they are far from a firm’s headquarters.
However, it is not a case of “a one size fits all.” China might offer economies of scale and a large labor force, such as being a leading producer and marketplace for the auto industry. Yet nations such as Mexico and the UK also offer the advantage of skilled labor in this sector.
Innovative technology is also likely to play a key role in the future of manufacturing, and where it is located. McKinsey cites the advance of 3D printing as a way that companies could actually replace traditional suppliers of parts with targeted usage of in-house printers.
Others are working on greater visibility of the best solution for manufacturers and how to piece the complex global picture together. A software tool called the Cost Differential Frontier developed by the University of Lausanne in Switzerland and supported by the US Department of Commerce helps companies figure out the best place to locate by comparing labor, trade financing, regulatory compliance and shipping costs, as well as issues of oversight, and political and security risks.
Whatever the solution, it is about taking advantage of access to global connections in many different parts of the world.
The days of simply assessing cheap versus expensive labor costs are long gone. For most companies, “next-shoring” is unlikely to be just one thing to consider, but many.
Modern manufacturers want variety and flexibility in their supply chains, which require multiple and cost-efficient connections to the diverse, demanding and truly global customers now being served.
Karen Reddington is president of FedEx Express Asia Pacific Division.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry