The magnitude of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) recent decisive victory over the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in the Jan. 16 presidential and legislative elections surprised many. It was so large that for some it might have created an irreconcilable fault line for the KMT.
That DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) would win the presidency was expected. However, that she would have a winning margin of more than 3 million votes startled some. Similarly it had also been expected that the DPP would gain seats in the 113-seat legislature, but that it would jump from 40 to an overwhelming majority of 68 seats left observers reeling.
With international observers taking part, the victory has been one that allowed pundits a wide and fertile range from which to give interpretations and projections. For example, one new feature present in the elections was the emergence of several “new” parties dedicated to social causes. This has been called the “third force,” though such judgments seem premature since parties built on social causes have no consistent ideological base to continue to build and too often rely on youth for their causes, who graduate and move on to career development.
Already evident from this was that only one of those new parties, the New Power Party (NPP), was successful; it captured three district seats and two legislator-at-large seats. The rest were left high and dry.
In the legislator-at-large vote, the NPP drew less than the already marginalized People First Party; its votes could be seen as a transfer from the minority Taiwan Solidarity Union, which went from three at legislator-at-large seats to none.
Nonetheless, victory was sweet and long in coming for many and none more so than for the dangwai (黨外, outside the party). These are the people who deserve credit for Taiwan’s democracy and on whose shoulders all that is happening is likely to stand.
The name of this group goes back to the one-party state days of the KMT and the membership is many and almost nebulous. For all in this group the Jan. 16 victory has been more than a victory, it has been a final justification of all their years of work. It is work that should not be forgotten.
The dangwai clearly began to make their mark and draw battle lines for democracy in the 1970s by running in different elections as independents, but the Kaohsiung Incident is where they came to the fore. Stymied by not being allowed to form a party for elections, the dangwai organized a Human Rights Day on Dec. 10, 1979 in Kaohsiung.
The KMT decided to put an end to the movement by disrupting it and using the turmoil as an excuse to arrest not only the ringleaders, but numerous others involved in any related leadership role. Their trials were to be showcase trials of “dissidents,” something that would put them down forever. As an even sterner warning, the murder of Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) twin daughters and his mother while he was in custody awaiting trial was a message that they should desist.
However, the trials only served to expose the one-party state dominance of the KMT, a party that allegedly supported democracy, and the struggles continued into the 1980s. Other dissidents were silenced, Chen Wen-chen (陳文成) and Henry Liu (劉宜良) were high-profile murders, but there were others and many were imprisoned on trumped up charges.
Dangwai became a name to recognize any and all who challenged the KMT. Many of them who studied or worked in the US became blacklisted.
The DPP was formed in 1986 when opposition parties were still illegal, but finally in 1987 martial law was lifted and multiple parties were allowed. The efforts of the dangwai to wrest power from the KMT continued, though now they had the right to belong to a party.
Free elections of the legislature came in 1992 along with the disbanding of the Garrison Command and finally the first direct election of the president in 1996.
Limited success came in 2000 when, by luck, the KMT ticket split and the DPP’s Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) snuck in with 39 percent of the vote. Chen won again by a narrow margin of 50.1 percent in 2004, but the opposition had never been able to control the legislature.
This struggle proved to be a long one and that is what makes this election so special.
The multiparty system and the right to elect legislators were won by the efforts of that nebulous group, the dangwai. High-profile names are evident, but so many contributed silently.
In today’s vote, people would not be allowed to even consider voting for social causes, let alone voting for another party without the dangwai. To vote for a social cause is a luxury that they made possible.
Just as there are still people in Taiwan whose lives were affected by the 228 Incident and the following White Terror era, so too there are few families whose lives have not be affected by the dangwai. This is an important message to be taken from these elections.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under