Technological innovation has long triggered diametrically opposed reactions — awe of new possibilities for some; for others, fear of disruptive change. However, most people do not even realize what is happening as change is taken for granted.
Human ingenuity is far too little recognized or appreciated, particularly in financial markets. Investors obsess about more pedestrian concerns — fears about a hard landing in China, the repercussions of falling crude oil prices and the risk that some shock could tip a fragile world economy into renewed recession or deflation.
Obviously, worries about international demand conditions are not unfounded — surely the last thing the world economy needs now is renewed stress. However, for all the angst about excessive debt and policy inadequacy, nothing is as important as human ingenuity for delivering improved living standards and investment opportunities. Indeed, the advent of new technologies holds out the promise of a “fourth industrial revolution,” the theme of this year’s World Economic Forum meeting in Davos.
The “first industrial revolution” was based on the steam engine. James Watt’s invention, introduced about 1775, powered the nineteenth-century expansion of industry from its origins in England to Europe and the US. The “second industrial revolution,” from the last third of the nineteenth century to the outbreak of World War I, was powered by developments in electricity, transportation, chemicals, steel and especially in mass production and consumption. Industrialization spread even further — to Japan after the Meiji Restoration and deep into Russia, which was booming at the outset of World War I. The “third industrial revolution” arrived at the end of the last century with the manufacture and diffusion of information technology.
The promise of a fourth industrial revolution consists in advances in robotics, the Internet of Things, big data, mobile telephony, and 3D printing. According to one estimate, the successful adoption of these new technologies could boost international productivity by as much as the personal computer and the Internet did during the late 1990s. For investors, the fourth revolution offers opportunities for vast profits, similar to those delivered by its predecessors. Already, early movers in fourth-generation technologies command eye-popping valuations.
New eras of rising investment, productivity and living standards are not just possible; they are probable, recurring with increasing frequency — and they are the result of human ingenuity. However, new eras require more than basic science or garage-based entrepreneurial wizardry. To be transformative, technology must be adopted and diffused into everyday life.
This is easier said than done. At the very outset of industrialization, Watt struggled financially and did not successfully commercialize his steam engine until he formed a partnership with the English manufacturer Matthew Boulton.
More important, history suggests that enthusiasm can run ahead of reality. One does not have to be a “productivity pessimist” — arguing, for example, that the indoor toilet was the last great human invention — to acknowledge that many new technologies deliver less than promised or reward investors only with long lags.
It is worth remembering that early steam power predated Boulton and Watt by nearly 100 years and that it took more than 50 years for their invention to overtake conventional water-mill power as the mainstay of 19th century industrial production. Volta first discovered electricity cells in 1800, but it took another 80 years to introduce direct current as a means of power transmission.
Likewise, the Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer (ENIAC) — the first electronic computer — was developed in secret during World War II. Computing power and usage grew exponentially over the ensuing decades of the twentieth century; but even as late as the 1980s, Nobel Prize in Economics laureate Robert Solow could quip that the computer age was “everywhere but in the productivity statistics.”
For investors, this consideration holds important implications — among them, the need to be patient and to resist the temptation to overpay early.
It is also important to understand how technology can transform seemingly unrelated industries. The advent of computing power enabled “big box” retailers in the US — Walmart, Staples, Home Depot, and others — to supplant both mom-and-pop stores and the established retail chains of the 1950s and 1960s. Computational power, together with advances in the logistics of transportation, storage, and delivery, enabled retailing on hitherto unimaginable economies of scale.
However, these same big-box giants are now under siege from online retailing, which promises even greater economies of scale and logistical efficiencies, undercutting even the most efficient brick-and-mortar operations.
New ways of producing things often kill off old industries and jobs before the full benefits of the successor mode of production are realized. A certain degree of violence inevitably accompanies human progress.
That is why the executives gathering in Davos this month are discussing how to “master” the Fourth Industrial Revolution. For all the awe-inspiring promises of technological advance, theirs is an apt concern.
Larry Hatheway is chief economist at GAM Holding.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if