The stakes Were certainly high in yesterday’s elections. Threats of doom and dire consequences filled the air as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) did not hesitate to play the “scare card.” It declared that any vote against the KMT was a vote for an uncertain future. Further, voting for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), would create a “scorched earth” policy in which most of the 23 nations that recognize Taiwan would quickly rush to China. Only the KMT could prevent this, or so they said.
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) added fuel to the fire. It threatened war if Taiwan did not accept the so-called “1992 consensus” of “one China” albeit with two interpretations, or if Taiwan uttered the dreaded independence word. Yet despite it all, despite this foreboding doom, Taiwanese overwhelmingly chose DPP candidate Tsai. Why?
To understand how this happened and how people rejected the KMT’s and the PRC’s rhetoric, it is helpful to use a metaphor of a game of cards, in which players compete to declare what will be trump.
Brandishing the ace of clubs, the PRC has constantly reminded Taiwan that it could not wait forever for the cross-strait issue to be settled. The patience of this sizable power has allegedly been wearing thin; Taiwan must come to see things Beijing’s way and admit that clubs are trump.
There have been nations that recognize clubs, but favor diamonds. They are aware of the trade advantages and economic benefits China provides them. They certainly do not want Taiwan rocking the boat. True, these nations also trade separately with Taiwan; they recognize its passport and grant its citizens separate visas.
However, they see no reason to endanger their pursuit of diamonds. Clubs and diamonds can be played together, especially if diamonds are trump.
Included here has been the US. It has been playing its cards with strategic ambiguity for a long time. It also does not want to hear any independence rhetoric from Taiwan. By nature it has to support democracy, but it feels that if diamonds were trump, all would benefit.
Taiwanese, of course, chose hearts. Their love of their nation and appreciation of freedom and their hard-won democracy have left them no choice despite any cultural links they might have had to China or any threats that come from there. Ironically, even the very presence of Chinese tourists in Taiwan has demonstrated over and over how Taiwan is different from China.
By choosing hearts, the majority of Taiwanese are conveying subtle and not so subtle messages. They recognize the word games that their outdated 1947 Constitution imposes on them with its claims of ruling China.
However, they also know that they are different from KMT members who insist on clinging to an outdated past with hearts that have been left in China.
Voting Taiwanese do not deny the attraction of diamonds or the threat of China’s clubs, yet in the final analysis, hearts have remained their best choice.
The choices account for three suits, yet there is one more, spades, a suit that diamond seeking pundits in the West often ignore. Claiming the inevitability of Taiwan coming under China, these pundits neglect or forget Japan. It is a mistake often made. While it recognizes its own need of diamonds, Japan plays the game with its cards close to its vest; it does not openly declare its reliance on spades.
In contrast, as China chooses bombast and states that it would declare war if Taiwan declared independence, Japan avoids showing its hand. Nonetheless for those that know how to read cards, if China attacked a democratic Taiwan, Japan would find a way to come to Taiwan’s defense. Never show your cards unless you have to, that is an unspoken rule of the game and Japan plays it well.
Thus, while China desires and covets Taiwan as an access to blue water, Japan knows that its national interests and long-term safety depend on a free and democratic Taiwan. In this, Japan has already shown its hand by protecting the islands that it calls the Senkakus [the Diaoyutai Islands, 釣魚台] and by extending its presence and influence into the South China Sea.
Japan has a sizable army and navy. It is up to Taiwanese to realize, if they have not already, that spades can protect hearts.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has claimed that he has reduced tensions with China and that even relations with Japan are good, but the voters have seen through Ma. This election has not only been a rejection of Ma’s China-friendly policies, it has likewise been a referendum on his Japan policy.
The results are in and they are clear. The presidential and legislative elections have been more than just national elections; they are an indication of the future. In this, they reflect and are part of the ongoing game of cards that is being played with China, where Taiwan has become disenchanted with whatever diamonds might have been promised. Surveys support the realization that Taiwanese see that China’s promise is not the panacea that it was portrayed to be eight years ago.
As the game goes on, Taiwan is also becoming more conscious of the benefits of its shared history with Japan, benefits that both sides can develop. For if Taiwan wishes to protect its independence and its democracy it would need to promote a stronger alliance with Japan.
By choosing hearts over clubs and diamonds, it is not rejecting assistance from the suit of spades.
Jerome Keating is a commentator in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.