China’s bid to leech talent
Beijing Institute of Technology’s Zhuhai Campus in Guangdong Province is trying to recruit 100 Taiwanese professors. Of course, talented people should be internationally mobile, but China is specifically targeting Taiwan, which makes one feel that “things are not that simple.”
Technical know-how is a matter that has implications for national security, and these professors have a good understanding of Taiwanese industries and technologies, which makes them important to national defense. When the Zhuhai Campus restricts its recruiting activities to Taiwanese technical talent, they are violating the principles of international mobility. University professors are specialists with doctoral degrees and looking for talent from around the world is the more enlightened approach. The problem is not that Taiwan lacks talented people, but that China’s “care and concern” for Taiwan makes one wonder whether there are ulterior motives behind this move.
China has an overall strategy for dealing with Taiwan, and it will not engage in all-out war or guerrilla warfare, so when it is looking to recruit Taiwanese university professors, they probably also has an overall plan for that. Studying technology is a practical and pragmatic matter and such students pay little attention to politics and ideology. As such, they will have less of an impact on Chinese campuses, and since they do not discuss politics and other such issues, they will also have less of the political impact that China fears so much.
We must not ignore China’s attempt to recruit Taiwanese professors, and we should come up with our own response. This is not “a good thing” as Minister of Education Wu Se-hwa (吳思華) said. It is far from that simple.
Chen Chi-nung
Nantou
Eric Chu is unreliable
The editorial “More empty promises from Eric Chu” (Jan. 10, page 8) strongly validates the public’s impression that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) is an untrustworthy politician. Political commentator Hu Chung-hsin (胡忠信) calls Chu a man without sincerity or creditability.
Chu’s low approval ratings as New Taipei City mayor and KMT chairman are very similar to those of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Ma repeatedly refused to run for Taipei mayor, but finally agreed to run when he was drafted as a “new Taiwanese” by then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝). Likewise, for several months Chu pretended he did not want to run for president. He managed to prevent others from running and got rid of Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱). Chu jumped into the race himself, using the make-believe slogan of “One Taiwan.” Chu deserves the title of “Ma minus-2.0” instead of “Ma 2.0.”
Chu thinks he is good at stabilizing Taiwan and improving the economy. These are empty promises. Taiwan feels threatened and the KMT has to hide Republic of China flags whenever Chinese officials visit the nation. Taiwan is even less stable after Chu and Ma both voluntarily degraded the so-called “1992 consensus” to “one China.” This is a unilateral change of the “status quo” by the KMT without the consent of Taiwanese.
Chu is good at accounting — not necessarily at the national economy. If Taiwan leans to far toward China in economic terms, the average salary of Taiwanese will drop below its current 16-year low. It is a shame that Taiwan has changed from a technical and financial service provider to China to an economic and political dependent.
According to a Japanese economist, the Chinese economy has slowed because of the heavy burden imposed by excessive spending on infrastructure projects, debt, over-employment, and being committed to too many “friendship projects” in Africa and other parts of the world. China is becoming “a country that is getting old before it gets rich.”
At a campaign march on Saturday, the KMT unveiled heart-shaped balloons that read: “I love Taiwan.” To prevent these balloons from bursting, the KMT should not push Taiwan into a deeper valley — politically and economically before power is transferred to the Democratic Progressive Party.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations