Abolishment of the death penalty, gay rights and marriage equality have become the “mud” slung at candidates with progressive ideas in this election campaign, as some candidates in their traditional party strongholds are facing serious challenges and have chosen to make desperate moves. It might be pathetic that candidates regard the topics as useful electoral tools, but what is more depressing is that society’s mood has allowed them to believe that such tactics will work and that the mud might actually be dirt that opposition party leaders want to — and do — shun.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative candidate Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) disparaged his New Power Party (NPP) rival, Freddy Lim (林昶佐), as having “hair that is longer than a woman’s,” and later denied that the description was judgemental.
Lin also said that what is “mentally abnormal” about Lim was his criticism against a prosecutor who scolded a socialite charged with rape and invasion of privacy — for filming sexual acts with women without their consent — as being “a pervert, childish and in need of treatment.”
Lin conveniently omitted the reason behind Lim’s condemnation, which was that he believed the prosecutor had vented her own personal feelings when she was required to objectively fulfill her duties.
The “pervert” was not the only target of public anger that Lin turned into a campaign tool. Lin often evoked the name of Cheng Chieh (鄭捷), who was found guilty of four murders and 22 counts of attempted manslaughter for a knifing spree in the Taipei MRT system, when telling his supporters that Lim supports the abolishment of the death penalty.
“[Lim] has held news conferences demanding a halt to executions. He thinks it is reasonable to keep feeding murderers like Cheng with our taxes,” Lin said at a campaign rally. “A person who does not respect life does not deserve to live.”
Just as some thought that the death penalty issue was a one-off incidental issue raised by a district candidate, the KMT legislative caucus yesterday called a news conference in the Legislative Yuan to question Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) if she supports the NPP candidates’ call for the abolishment of capital punishment.
No explanation or argument was given during the news conference as to why capital punishment cannot be abolished, which, regrettably, indicates that abolishment has become an issue that is in itself deprecating enough for politicians to employ it as an effective “negative” campaign tool.
In Hualien, where KMT candidate Wang Ting-son (王廷升) is facing a tough battle against the DPP’s Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), photographs of a gay pride parade, in which scantily clad participants used bawdy language for their banners and called for marriage equality and diverse family composition, have been used to attack Hsiao’s endorsement of marriage equality and related legislation. The KMT’s Hualien chapter has been distributing campaign leaflets and digital media calling Hsiao’s proposals “family-breaking,” “erosive to family ethics” and “morally degrading.”
“Please save our society, families and the next generation,” the campaign materials read.
In 2009, the Legislative Yuan, in which the KMT then had an overwhelming majority, agreed to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which obliges signatories to abolish capital punishment or prepare to if incapable of immediately abolishing it. After the US Supreme Court legalized gay marriage in June last year, the KMT posted on its Facebook page that “diversity needs to be respected and the rainbow allowed to be seen.”
Nothing can stop politicians from capitalizing on public anger or social prejudices for their own benefit until the public allows for rational deliberation when it encounters relevant issues.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations