Nation wasting talent
The average age of professors at National Taiwan University is rising and 12,000 people are to reach retirement age within the next 10 years. Taiwan’s falling birth rate is a serious problem and a number of vocational high schools and universities are at risk of closing down.
However, some universities continue to open new graduate schools, while doctoral degree holders, who are getting younger, have problems finding teaching positions. If the graduates have no way of making use of their education, then the purpose of higher education becomes meaningless.
Young academics have no future in Taiwan, teachers complain that salaries are low, while retired instructors say that they still have something to offer. Talented students who do not want to be hampered by this situation are forced to go abroad to teach.
Universities in Singapore, Hong Kong, China and the Middle East are competing to recruit these talents.
Chinese schools offer annual salaries of 1 million yuan to 1.5 million yuan (US$151,000 to US$227,000), about five times the wages offered in Taiwan. Doctoral degree holders from top universities are paid more, so it is not surprising that so many people are leaving Taiwan.
Higher education is the future of any nation and Taiwan is nurturing many talented professionals and young academics, but there are more schools than needed. The number of people with doctoral degrees keeps increasing, and if salaries and benefits continue to lag, no amount of planning would be able to remedy the situation.
If the nation is to keep its educated elites at home, the Ministry of Education must take precautions and restrict the number of doctoral degrees, raise salaries and improve benefits. It is a pity to see Taiwan spend so much time and resources on educating talented people, only to let other nations enjoy the benefits.
Wu Yi-chung
Chiayi
Asia key to global security
US Senator Marco Rubio made the most sense among all Republican candidates in the US presidential race when he said that the US would help Taiwan, Japan and South Korea if needed (“US presidential candidate pledges to defend Taiwan,” Jan. 9, page 4).
Republicans and the US need to hear more discussions on such issues and less Donald Trump drivel.
US Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Rodham Clinton has already voiced her determination to work for a safe East Asia.
It is a bipartisan concern and few candidates in the US seem to understand the importance of this region to global security.
Dave Hall
Taoyuan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry