An agreement was reached last month at the COP21 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Although there have been various assessments regarding the outcome of the talks, the agreement means that nations around the world have a common trajectory toward addressing global warming.
Global warming is already having a noticeable impact on the climate. The nations at the convention have agreed to work toward keeping the rise in global average temperatures to less than 2oC above pre-industrial levels and to aim for a maximum increase of 1.5oC.
Reports show that last year was the warmest year on record, with a yearly average temperature that was 2.4oC greater than the normal range — and that is forecast to keep on rising this year. Through satellite observations, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has discovered that temperatures in the Arctic increased faster than those at other latitudes in the past few years, which shows that the Arctic is especially vulnerable to global warming.
Rising Arctic temperatures will not only affect global weather and climate systems, but will also cause shrinking ice caps and a decrease in the reflection of solar radiation, which would further speed up surface warming. It would also disrupt jet streams and increase fluctuations in the atmosphere that would result in more extreme weather. Many climatologists are therefore concerned over Arctic warming and worry that it might be the tipping point for the climate system.
Global warming is already having a tangible effect on Taiwan. A look at the nation’s response to climate change over the past few years shows that — apart from having announced the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act (溫室氣體減量法) — there is much room for improvement.
Here are four points for the government to consider:
First, giving a proper response to climate change and the Paris agreement requires setting strategic goals. These goals should include the initiation of a low-carbon economy and building a low-carbon society; developing cost-effective carbon reduction technologies and strategies to improve environmental competitiveness; and reducing the impacts of and losses caused by increasingly frequent extreme weather events, with a focus on mitigation and adaptation.
Second, there must be no more empty talk about reduction goals. Concrete and feasible carbon reduction and adaptation strategies should be laid down and the cost of implementing each strategy should be calculated in detail. This is the only way to calculate expenditures, average unit costs, marginal costs and the amount of funds needed. The only practical way is to employ cost-effective methods to promote carbon reduction and adaptation.
In addition, a dedicated agency needs to be established with unified powers to deal with climate change. The Environmental Protection Administration is charged with organizing the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Office, which is responsible for enforcing the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act. The Ministry of Economic Affairs is in charge of the Energy Administration Act (能源管理法) and the Renewable Energy Development Act (再生能源發展條例), but its remit is restricted to industry and reducing the use of electricity. There is no agency in charge of reductions in residential and commercial areas.
There are 20 million cars in Taiwan, but there is no action from the Ministry of Transportation and Communications. The National Development Council’s Office for National Land Planning and Development is only in charge of coordinating adaptation affairs. The Ministry of Education’s Construction and Planning Administration, together with the National Police Agency and the National Disaster Prevention Center have the personnel, funding and practical implementation ability, but they are not in charge of adaptation.
Finally, the Paris agreement requires each signatory to analyze the effects of its mitigation actions on global warming by 2018 — two years before the agreement takes effect — and adjust its mitigation plan by 2020. Once the agreement is implemented, a general review is to take place every five years — with the first scheduled to take place in 2023 — aimed at letting the signatories renew and set more ambitious targets.
Taiwan has already announced an independent contribution report. If it is to be internationally accepted, a careful assessment must be made to determine whether the organizational framework, execution and plans for future reductions meet the requirements of international analysis.
Young Chea-yuan is a professor and chairman of the Department of Natural Resources at Chinese Culture University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under