Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) repeatedly criticizes Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) over her stance on the so-called “1992 consensus,” because he knows public opinion has abandoned him and he can only play the “communist scare card.” This is both shameless and ignorant.
With Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) facing problems at home, he is unable to assist the KMT, though he might be willing. Not only did Xi’s meeting with President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) fail to boost the KMT’s presidential campaign, hostile buyouts of enterprises in Taiwan’s core industries by Chinese state-run enterprises have also caused a backlash.
Xi’s biggest problem is military reform. An article in Dongxiang magazine said that Chinese military reform aims at transforming the nation’s military from a past Russian system to a US system so that, by 2020, the military command would run from the Chinese Central Military Commission through a joint chief of staff down to commanders and on to the troops, with the seven military districts changed to four or five battle zones, which could be integrated into a joint command. Doing this would involve cuts among high-ranking officers and this is upsetting morale.
The online Boxun News reported that one-seventh of all Chinese generals have been arrested in Xi’s anti-corruption campaign — seven or eight times more than the number of vice provincial ministerial heads and bureaucrats who have been arrested, not to mention a batch of military officers generally seen as corrupt who have yet to be arrested. Also, by cutting service personnel by 300,000, Xi is able to replace high-ranking military officers with his own people. This is shaking up the entire military, and some say Xi is sitting on top of a volcano.
These big structural and personnel changes must undergo an adjustment period and reform is expected to be completed by 2020. This makes it unlikely that China would be able to launch a war within the next five years and that if the KMT poses a threat or if Ma causes any disorder before or after the elections on Jan. 16, it would be US and Japanese troops, rather than Chinese, who would help suppress an uprising.
China has kept a low profile to avoid accidental conflict with the US or Japan. After its new military system is in place, it would need practice. Dongxiang has reported that it might use the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) — which Taiwan also claims — as a target, although Beijing would risk an all-out war with Japan, which also claims them.
The Japanese defense budget is expected to reach a new high this year, and it is strengthening its military capacity around its southern islands closest to Taiwan because the region would be seen as the weakest link if China wanted to break through the “first island chain.”
China would not dare declare war on Taiwan, which is protected by the US-Japan Security Treaty. If China’s military were to practice by invading Kinmen and Matsu, Taiwan should seize the chance to change its national title just to get rid of the Chinese nightmare for good.
China might start an economic war instead, but that would force Taiwan to accelerate its economic transformation by developing new industries and turning to the West, Southeast Asia and India. The Chinese economy is facing a number of crises and China would also suffer losses in an economic war with Taiwan, so the possibility of such a struggle emerging is not high. It would not be the end of the world if China won over Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, because it would inevitably push the US and Japan to review their “one China” policy and its negative effects on democratic Taiwan and regional security.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s