Anyone who caught the Danish political drama Borgen on television will remember the high-powered blonde journalist, Katrine Fonsmark, pottering around in her cramped, but charming canal-side apartment.
Fonsmark and her on-off spin doctor lover, Kasper Juul, take refuge from their frantic lives in their one-person apartments — and when they do move in together, it all goes horribly wrong.
According to real-life journalist Laura Engstrom, 44, and graphic designer Laura Danielsen, 38, both of whom live in the same red-brick tenement as the fictional Fonsmark, this is very much how life is for many young Danes.
Illustration: Mountain People
“It’s easier to count the ones who are not single,” Engstrom said, thinking about the building. “Just in my entrance there are six or seven flats, and I think there’s only one family.”
“Her life as portrayed in Borgen doesn’t strike me as odd in any way,” Danielsen said. “When I was younger I used to work so much, and when you came back you’d just be knackered and need to sleep and unwind. When I was younger people didn’t necessarily want to share a flat.”
According to People in the EU, a new publication from the EU’s statistical office, Eurostat, Denmark boasts by far the highest proportion of single-person households of any nation in the EU, at 45 percent. Finland, the nation with the next highest share, has only 40.8 percent. In the UK it is 30.6 percent. In Spain, 23.2 percent.
Statistics Denmark figures shows the phenomenon of alene-kultur, as the Danes call it, has been on the march for decades, with the proportion of Danes living alone rising by 42 percent since 1986.
“Part of the equation relates to social norms,” said Maria Iacovou, a reader in quantitative sociology at Cambridge University and an expert on European living arrangements. “If you’re looking at young adults particularly, certainly in Italy, if a young man wanted to go and live alone, people might say ‘what’s wrong with his family?’ whereas in the Scandinavian nations they might ask what’s wrong with a young person if they are living with their parents when they are 29?”
Denmark is a highly individualist society, according to The Hofstede Centre, which analysis national cultures according to the “cultural dimensions” theory of Dutch sociologist Geert Hofstede.
However, Iacovou said that economics is equally important, with Danes and other Scandinavians enjoying generally high salaries, high levels of employment and the support of a generous welfare state.
“A lot of it is about money,” she said. “To live alone, you need to be able to afford to live alone, because living alone is probably the most expensive living arrangement.”
Engstrom points out that in Denmark citizens receive money from the government for rent if they have a low income, to study if they are young and for child support if, like her, they are divorced.
“The Danish welfare system supports being single,” she said. “It’s in the culture. You just want to leave the family home as quickly as possible, and because the welfare state supports it, it’s possible.”
Living alone does not necessarily mean being lonely, Danielsen said, adding that she meets others often in cafes and restaurants.
“There are a lot of really beautiful gardens hidden away behind the houses in Copenhagen, and people hang out there in the summer and do cook-ups. A lot of social engagement and a lot of friendships come from living in the same building,” she said. “I have a big group of friends that I love, but I really need at some point to come back to a place where it’s really quiet where I can recharge.”
Johannes Andersen, a social scientist at Aalborg University who has studied the growth of alene-kultur, said that Denmark’s extreme level of single-living is giving birth to a new type of flexible community, with growing numbers spending their evenings at food clubs, book groups and film clubs.
The change is starting to affect the housing stock, with the number of one-person apartments and small terraced and courtyard houses of between 80m2 and 130m2, growing from 7 percent to 13 percent of housing since 1981, the Danish Association of Chartered Estate Agents figures showed.
There is another side, though. According to a 2010 article by Kirsten Gram-Hanssen, a professor at the Danish Building Research Institute at Aalborg University, Danes who live alone seem to be significantly less happy.
“The notion of young, urban people living alone and enjoying life is not the picture that emerges,” she wrote.
While half of those who lived with others describe themselves as “very happy,” that goes for less than a third of those living alone — “a very significant difference,” Gram-Hanssen said.
Indeed, Denmark has not only seen growth in the number of adults who live alone; it has also witnessed an increase in the number of adults who are not in any relationship at all.
Statistics Denmark reported in January that the proportion of single Danes had hit an all-time record of 37 percent, up from 32 percent in 1986.
A 2013 study by the agency found that one in 12 Danes between the ages of 30 and 50 either seldom or never met any friends, or seldom or never met their family.
“That’s the other side of an individualistic society; for better or for worse, you don’t have your family like you have in Italy,” Engstrom said. “In the Scandinavian countries we have the welfare system, but the welfare system doesn’t love you, and hopefully your family does.”
That is perhaps part of the reason why in Copenhagen, which was hit harder by the global financial crisis than any other city in Scandinavia, and where property prices have been soaring, the process is beginning to turn.
While over the past two decades the proportion of Danes who live alone has climbed more than 2 percentage points to 23.7 percent, the proportion in Copenhagen has fallen markedly from 38 percent to 28.5 percent.
Oslo, the Norwegian capital, is now the European city with the highest share of single-person households, at 53 percent.
“From the tiny little bubble in which I live, creative Copenhagen and the NGO [non-governmental organization] environment, I do think that things are changing,” Danielsen said, adding that she has herself started looking into sharing a living space.
Several of the one-person apartments in her building have been combined with the one next door to create a larger living space, she said.
“It seems that there are many people who are interested in that way of living, and also politically they want to live a bit more that way. I do find it a little bit ridiculous that I, as one person, have this flat,” she said.
However, that would mean saying goodbye to her idyllic cobbled street, with the canal in front filled with pleasure boats, the hippy haven of Freetown Christiania a few blocks behind and the Danish parliament — where Borgen’s Kasper and Katrine conspire and machinate — just a two-minute cycle-hop across the bridge.
“It’s very nice,” she said. “And I will never get a flat like this again if I sell it.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with