Wed, Dec 23, 2015 - Page 8 News List

South China Sea bullying must stop

By Brahma Chellaney

Since late 2013, China has been engaged in the frenzied creation of artificial islands and the militarization of the South China Sea. This amounts to an alarming quest for control over a strategically crucial corridor through which US$5.3 trillion in trade flows each year.

However, what is even more shocking — not to mention dangerous — is that China has incurred no international costs for its behavior.

Of course, the international community has a lot on its plate nowadays, not least a massive refugee crisis fueled by chaos in the Middle East. However, the reality is that, as long as China feels free to maneuver without consequence, it will continue to do so, fueling tensions with its neighbors that could easily turn into all-out conflict, derailing Asia’s rise.

A key component of China’s strategy in the South China Sea is the dredging of low-tide elevations to make small islands, including in areas that, as Chinese Deputy Foreign Minister for Asian Affairs Liu Zhenmin (劉振民) recently acknowledged, “are far from the Chinese mainland.”

In China’s view, that distance makes it “necessary” to build “military facilities” on the islands and, indeed, three of the seven newly constructed islets include airfields, from which Chinese warplanes could challenge the US Navy’s ability to operate unhindered in the region.

By militarizing the South China Sea, Beijing is seeking to establish a de facto air defense identification zone like the one that it formally — and unilaterally — declared in 2013 in the East China Sea, where it claims islands that it does not control. China knows that, under international law, its claim to sovereignty over virtually all of the resource-endowed South China Sea, based on an “historic right,” is weak — that is why it has opposed international adjudication. Instead, it is trying to secure “effective control” — which, under international law, enhances significantly the legitimacy of a nation’s territorial claim — just as it has done in the Himalayas and elsewhere.

However, China’s ambitions extend beyond the South China Sea — It aims to create a strongly China-centric Asia. Thus, the nation recently established its first overseas military base — a naval hub in Djibouti, on the Horn of Africa — and it has repeatedly sent submarines into the Indian Ocean. Moreover, China is engaging in far-reaching economic projects — such as the “One Belt, One Road” initiative, which entails the construction of infrastructure linking Asia to Europe — that would strengthen its presence in, and influence over, a number of nations, thereby recasting regional geopolitics in its image.

Meanwhile, the administration of US President Barack Obama remains hesitant to back up its much-publicized “pivot” toward Asia with meaningful action — especially action to constrain China. Instead of, say, imposing sanctions or exerting localized military pressure on China, Washington has attempted to pass the buck. Specifically, it has stepped up military cooperation with other Asia-Pacific nations, encouraged other claimants to territory in the South China Sea to shore up their defenses and supported a more active role in regional security for democratic powers such as Australia, India and Japan.

To put it bluntly, that is not enough. Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, unlike natural islands, China’s constructed islands — which were built on top of natural features that did not originally rise above the water at high tide — do not have sovereignty over 12 nautical miles (22.2km) of the surrounding sea. Yet it was not until recently that the US sent a warship within 12 nautical miles of an artificial island and even then, it was just a sail-through that an official Chinese mouthpiece dismissed as a “political show.” The US did not challenge China’s territorial claims directly, or demand that China halt its island-building program.

This story has been viewed 3096 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top