A group of high-profile business leaders has challenged governments — meeting in a crunch week for the climate — to set strong targets and not slam the door on limiting warming to 1.5°C.
On Monday, a Paris meeting aimed at reaching a global deal to fight climate changed kicked up to a higher level, with government ministers taking personal charge of negotiations.-
As ministers arrived in Paris, the chief executives of companies such as Virgin, Marks & Spencer, L’Oreal and Unilever said it was critical for governments to reach for stronger targets that would free the world’s economy from carbon emissions by 2050 and avoid dangerous warming.
The corporate leaders, members and supporters of the B Team, a coalition of chief executives for climate action, said governments should aim for a stronger target than the agreed goal of 2°C and aim for actions that would eventually limit warming to 1.5°C.
The support for a 1.5oC goal puts some of the world’s most powerful corporate leaders in sync with small island nations and poor countries that are most vulnerable to climate change — as well as campaign groups, which have been pressing rich nations to up their ambition.
“We believe that net zero by 2050 would at least get us to 2 degrees, leaving the door open for further reduction to 1.5, which should be something we should be looking at in the future,” said Jochen Zeitz, the former chief executive of Puma and founder with Richard Branson of the B Team.
“We believe the business case for net zero in 2050 is irrefutable,” Zeitz told a seminar on Sunday hosted by the B Team.
Branson, a long-time supporter of action on climate change, said companies were looking to the talks to provide a clear signal — and would be able to get to carbon neutrality by mid-century.
“We just need governments to set some rules,” Branson said. “Carbon neutral by 2050, we will have 35 years to get there. It’s actually just not that big a deal, but we need clear long-term goals set by governments this week. Give us that goal and we will make it happen.”
The 1.5°C goal is seen as a matter of life and death for some of the world’s poorest nations, and has been a key issue in climate negotiations.
Vulnerable countries argue that the 2°C goal backed by the US, China and Europe would seal the fate of hundreds of millions of people in low-lying nations such as Bangladesh and the Philippines.
The business leaders said they were framing their demand on governments in terms of emissions reductions, with a goal of net zero by 2050, because those were targets companies could set for themselves.
However, privately some of the leaders said they were concerned about the politics of coming out explicitly for 1.5°C, instead of 2°C, but they acknowledged that was indeed their goal.
“Yes, we are for 1.5 degrees,” Mo Ibrahim, the founder of Celtel International, one of Africa’s leading mobile phone companies, told the seminar.
The companies which signed on to the B Team argue that their support for a strong emissions reductions goal helps to keep pressure on governments to reach a strong deal.
The corporate leaders suggested their support for a strong agreement provides an important counterweight to the fossil-fuel industries, especially in the US, which have blocked action on climate change, but they said they believed that the economy had reached a tipping point in terms of moving toward greener sources of energy.
The French hosts of the climate talks on Sunday said they had recruited a team of ministers and officials from 14 nations to help put together a deal. The leaders immediately convened a series of small working groups that to home in on elements of a deal.
Negotiators said they felt reasonably optimistic for a strong outcome at the Paris meeting. In contrast to previous climate meetings — which deadlocked early — officials managed to pare down a draft text on schedule, leaving a full week for ministers to reach agreement.
Former Irish president Mary Robinson, head of the Foundation for Climate Justice, said she believed the draft released on Saturday had kept prospects alive for a 1.5°C goal.
“We have a commitment to stay below 2 degrees and keep open the prospect of 1.5,” Robinson said. “Keeping that window of 1.5, which I think will happen in this agreement, is extremely important.”
The prospects for achieving that goal are extremely daunting. Scientists estimate the world has already warmed by 1°C since the industrial revolution.
More than 100 of the 196 nations at the Paris meeting want a 1.5°C goal, but until recently the 1.5°C goal was dismissed as a pipe dream by rich nations and the bigger developing countries.
However, now there is greater recognition of 1.5°C as a threshold for dangerous climate change.
With current warming of 1°C, low-lying states in Africa, Asia and island nations are already exposed to extreme storms and weather phenomena such as this year’s strong El Nino.
Last week, a group of nations most at risk broke away from the big developing country bloc and signed a declaration urging a 1.5°C target.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.