Need a Kalashnikov in Belgium? No problem, says “Nemac,” a Serb; a few hundred euros will buy the gun and a place to stash it in a car or truck coming up from the Balkans.
A veteran of the Yugoslav wars, talking to reporters at a drab truck stop outside the Serbian capital, Nemac does not smuggle guns himself, he says. However, he knows people who can ship rifles of the kind used in the Nov. 13 Paris attacks.
He describes a trove of guns across the Balkans — a legacy of the Yugoslav military.
Illustration: Mountain People
The main militant threat in Europe has long been the bomb. Yet over the past year, attacks by French and Belgian militants returned from Syria has brought fresh scrutiny of gunrunning routes into the heart of Europe, for many years the domain of Balkan gangsters supplying criminals in western Europe.
The source of all the weapons used in the Paris attacks is unclear, but at least some were on Saturday reported to have come from a batch made in Belgrade in the late 1980s.
However, what is generally clear is that arms are increasingly finding their way into the hands of extremists.
“There are plenty of nooks and crannies in a car or truck where you can hide a disassembled gun,” said Nemac, whose nom de guerre means “the German.”
“People hide them in the fuel tank,” he said.
His associate, Milan, laid out the price list for weaponry filched from Yugoslav, Albanian and other arsenals:
Up to 700 euros (US$741) for an AK-47 of Yugoslav manufacture; Albanian models and Chinese versions from Maoist Tirana come cheaper.
“Silenced weapons cost more, submachine guns that are easier to conceal, they cost more,” Milan said.
“Pistols are still fairly cheap, around 150 euros apiece,” he added.
It is a shopping list that shows the scale of the problem facing Europe’s police forces.
“The terrorist threat ... is operating on the boundaries between terrorism and serious crime,” EU police agency Europol director Rob Wainwright told the European Parliament last week, adding that there could be further attacks using guns sold by Balkan crime networks to Westerners.
The threat is not new. Nor is the connection from the Balkans to France and notably Belgium, where police data show nearly 6,000 firearms seizures per year, more than all of France.
However, efforts to crack down are struggling to keep pace with events and the proliferation of smuggling routes, including from Libya and eastern Ukraine.
In May last year, Frenchman Mehdi Nemmouche, 29, back from Syria, used an AK-47, the classic Kalashnikov of the Soviet world, to gun down four people at the Jewish Museum in Brussels.
At Charlie Hebdo magazine and a kosher grocery in Paris in January, Kalashnikovs were again used, some acquired in Belgium like those carried by the man accused of trying to cause mayhem on a Brussels to Paris express train in August.
Then there were the guns used by three attackers to mow down 89 people at the Bataclan theater during a rock concert.
Although bearing the Kalashnikov name, the traded guns are mostly versions made many years ago by state firms in Yugoslavia, Albania and China and have nothing to do with the modern-day firm.
Kalashnikov itself could not be reached for comment.
The Nov. 13 attacks happened just hours after French Minister of the Interior Bernard Cazeneuve unveiled an action plan against traffickers from the East.
“Arms smuggling is behind many acts of terrorism,” he said that day, decrying “military arsenals fallen into the hands of civilians and mafias” in the former Soviet bloc and the Balkans.
However, for all the new resolve of the EU to tighten borders and close loopholes in laws that already effectively ban private ownership of rapid-fire weapons, Nemac, Milan and a jaded Serbian policeman doubt it can end the trade.
The Serbian police officer, who is involved in counter-trafficking operations, said investigators uncover maybe one-third of shipments at best.
The problem is the sheer volume of weapons, he said, recounting a tale of a man who told customs officers at Serbia’s border with the EU that he was a musician and had nothing to declare but his old accordion.
When officers checked his car, there was a hole in the fuel tank patched with tape and there were 20 guns inside.
On another occasion, a handgun was discovered in a bag of pork rinds and a gun found hidden in a sandwich.
There are an estimated 80 million firearms in the EU already. However, they are mostly tightly licensed or state owned. It is the availability of old military hardware on the black market that makes the Balkans a focus.
“You don’t know where these weapons are, who holds them or how they are being used,” said Ivan Zverzhanovski of the Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons, a Belgrade-based monitor of weapons proliferation.
A week before the Paris attacks, Serbia announced that Serbian and French security agencies had rounded up a major gang running guns between the two countries. Few media reported it.
Almost simultaneously, German traffic police stopped a Volkswagen Golf driven by a man from Serbia’s ex-Yugoslav neighbor Montenegro. They found eight Kalashnikov AK-47s, several handguns and explosives. His navigation system showed he was headed for Paris. No direct link has been found with the Nov. 13 attacks, but it is no isolated case.
The ease with which arms are crossing into the EU and then across Europe’s open-borders Schengen zone is now contributing, along with the movements of the killers themselves and of hundreds of thousands of migrants, to calls for much tighter frontier checks and new internal EU controls.
Yet, it seems impossible to eradicate entirely a trade in illegal guns that still flourishes inside the EU itself.
Indeed, there is some irony that Brussels, self-styled “capital” of the EU and also home to the NATO military alliance, has become a marketplace for such hardware.
“If you have 500 to 1,000 euros, you can get a military weapon within half an hour,” said Bilal Benyaich, an expert on Muslim radicals who works at the city’s Itinera Institute think tank.
“That makes Brussels look more like a large US city,” he added, contrasting it to the norm in Europe, where guns are rare and automatics rarer still compared with the US.
Some of that is a legacy of past lax Belgian gun laws — they were tightened a decade ago — in a nation that has long been a major manufacturer and exporter of firearms.
Belgian police did not respond to requests for comment.
The sums Benyaich cites, up to 1,000 euros in Brussels for a Kalashnikov, represent only a 50 percent to 100 percent markup on the asking price at source, suggestive of the ease at which illicit guns are crossing Europe’s borders, despite the risks if caught.
“Once the deal is made, local sellers dismantle weapons and ship them,” Milan said. “The main difficulty is to enter the Schengen zone — Hungary — undetected. Once inside Schengen, a wise man would change vehicles two or three times.”
“That means you need a network — and the more people get involved, the bigger is the chance of a leak to police,” he added.
One hurdle for the Islamic State group, especially after Paris, might just be the consciences of old soldiers like Nemac and Milan.
“It’s a dirty business,” Nemac said of the trade.
“No one from Serbia, no Christian, would knowingly sell arms to Islamic killers,” Milan added.
However, the EU is not counting on that and has moved to tighten firearms rules this month.
It plans an EU-wide registration marking system for guns and common EU standards on deactivation — an AK-47 that killed Charlie Hebdo cartoonists was bought legally as a decommissioned collector’s item in EU member Slovakia. And although illicit guns are also trickling in from elsewhere, notably Libya and eastern Ukraine, the EU is focusing on tighter control from the Balkans.
Other challenges lie ahead. If guns can be smuggled in sandwiches, they are also increasingly being traded online on the “dark Web” or assembled from parts bought separately, some legally online. Technological progress brings new dangers.
Aware that 3D printers have been used to make viable guns, France has called for an EU ban on software to make them.
The stakes are high for European governments. As the Paris attacks showed, just a few weapons can make a huge impact.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.