Bilateral negotiations between Taiwan and China on the proposed cross-strait trade in goods agreement were held last week. Apart from a regulation that imported goods should pass customs within 48 hours, which aroused serious concerns over food safety, China’s main demand was for the “normalization of economic and trade relations,” calling on Taiwan to abolish import restrictions on Chinese agricultural and industrial products.
Bureau of Foreign Trade data showed that, as of last month, Taiwan’s goods for export and import included 2,207 product items that are not allowed to be imported from China, while a further 330 items can only be imported from China under certain conditions. These items account for about 20 percent of all the listed product types, which number 11,574 in total. Among them are 707 strictly agricultural products, 320 kinds of processed agricultural products and prepared foods and 1,510 other industrial products. When Taiwan joined the WTO, it was determined that if Taiwan allowed imports of these products from China, it would have a heavy economic and social impact, so Taiwan continued to restrict their import.
Officials have made conflicting statements about how President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government intends to respond to China’s demand for the “normalization” of trade ties.
On Friday last week, the Ministry of Economic Affairs released a document presenting explanatory information on the agreement, which is being negotiated under the terms of the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement.
The report presented Taiwan’s negotiating positions as follows: First, to proceed step by step, without deregulating everything all in one go; second, not to deregulate sensitive items that affect matters such as food safety, basic safety and the employment requirements of ethnic minorities in outlying areas. Still more worthy of attention is that, in using the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model to deduce that the agreement, once signed, would boost Taiwan’s GDP by 1.63 percent, the ministry’s report adopts a simulation scenario in which Taiwan reduces tariffs on agricultural and industrial products excluding the 707 restricted kinds of agricultural goods, while China cuts customs duties on all agricultural and industrial products imported from Taiwan.
In this regard, the ministry’s position of pledging to “normalize economic and trade relations” with China and eventually abolish restrictions on imports of Chinese agricultural and industrial products is exposed for all to see. First, Taiwan seeks to maintain restrictions on the 707 items of narrowly defined agricultural products. Second, it wants to deregulate the 330 kinds of processed agricultural products and prepared foods as the years go by. Third, it also aims to deregulate the 1,510 items in the category of other industrial products over the years. As to “proceeding step by step,” Taiwan wants to follow the “five baskets” model of tariff reduction, under which four broad categories of goods would respectively be deregulated immediately and after five, 10 and 15 years, while those in the fifth “basket” are exempt from deregulation. The actual results of the talks could be even worse.
Does Taiwan really have to open its doors wider to imports of Chinese processed agricultural products and prepared foods, just to serve the interests of big corporations in the display panel and petrochemical industries? Should we really be sacrificing our food safety and farmers’ rights and the livelihood of workers in industries that serve the domestic market, like steel, textiles, electrical equipment, cables, glass, ceramics, rubber and automobile parts, for the sake of these corporate interests?
Lai Chung-chiang is convener of the Economic Democracy Union.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.