A high voter turnout on Sunday at the Hong Kong district council elections was of great symbolic importance. Two new political trends can be discerned from this first manifestation of public sentiment since last year’s “Umbrella movement” protests.
First, Hong Kongers are in a new political normal after the watershed district elections. Although councilors serve as policy advisers to the government and exercise little power in the decisionmaking process, the victory of several young Umbrella movement activists over pro-Beijing politicians represents a milestone in the territory’s struggle for democracy.
In the post-1997 decades, Hong Kongers have fiercely debated the implementation of universal suffrage toward the election of the territory’s chief executive and legislators.
However, Beijing has only transferred political authority to its handpicked officials, who lack legitimacy in the eyes of the public.
Without an appealing ideology, it has become increasingly difficult for Beijing and its officials to win the hearts and minds of Hong Kongers.
Second, the Umbrella movement has facilitated a rapid transformation of Hong Kong’s collective identity from a post-colonial territory into a mature civil society, expressing a strong desire for democratic governance.
One unintended consequence of last year’s territory-wide protests is the rise of contentious politics.
Since the 1997 handover of Hong Kong’s sovereignty to China, young people have been keenly aware of living and working in an environment different from the British colonial era.
Concerned about the territory’s well-being, they have engaged in a series of grassroots campaigns to protect historical heritages, defend human rights and oppose ideological indoctrination in the public school system.
Worried about the marginalization of Hong Kong by China, young people are seeking new avenues for political and social mobility.
Against this backdrop, the Umbrella movement activists are directly confronting autocratic rulers.
They have not only mastered the skills of democratic electioneering and defeated pro-Beijing politicians, but also created new coalitions with other pro-democracy groups to resist Beijing’s agenda of merging Hong Kong with China in 2047.
Evidently, China is evaluating the electoral outcomes and the effects on its “one country, two systems” policy.
After all, Hong Kong is still a vibrant civil society, with freely organized political parties, a free press and an independent judiciary.
Unless Beijing gets to grips with the new public sentiment and makes concessions, it will be extremely difficult to assert an effective rule in an open and diverse society.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is a professor of history and co-director of the bachelors’ program in Global Asia Studies at Pace University in New York.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry