Thu, Nov 26, 2015 - Page 9 News List

Virtual reality bringing fresh, new perspective to journalism

The ‘New York Times’ is helping make virtual reality mainstream with its Google Cardboard linkup — but some say that it may raise ethical concerns

By Ben Cardew  /  The Guardian

Earlier this month, a new tool in the evolution of digital journalism arrived in the homes of 1 million New York Times subscribers in the form of a cardboard box.

The unassuming package contained a pre-assembled Google Cardboard set, a cheap and cheerful virtual reality (VR) viewer that, when combined with a smartphone and the NYT VR app, allowed readers to watch The Displaced, an 11-minute film about refugee children, in immersive, 360?video.

“The box itself seems destined to be remembered with a disbelieving laugh, like the shoe-size mobile phones in a Seinfeld rerun,” the New York Times’ public editor Margaret Sullivan wrote. “But at the moment, this is new.”

New — well, not exactly. Virtual reality, as anyone who put on a Sega VR headset in the 1990s knows, has been around for decades.

However, recently, the price of virtual reality equipment has plummeted — you can buy a Google Cardboard set for less than £10 (US$15.10) — and several of the world’s largest tech companies are investing heavily in virtual reality, including Facebook and Google.

“Virtual reality appears to be on the cusp of mainstream adoption,” said the introduction to a report from the Tow Center for Digital Journalism, virtual reality production company Secret Location and PBS’ Frontline show, who all collaborated on Frontline’s first virtual reality documentary, Ebola Outbreak: A Virtual Journey.

“For journalists, the combination of immersive video capture and dissemination via mobile VR players is particularly exciting,” the report continues. “It promises to bring audiences closer to a story than any previous platform.”

This sense of connection is key to the appeal of virtual reality, said New York Times Magazine editor-in-chief Jake Silverstein, who was integral to its adoption by the organization.

“Every other type of storytelling involves framing, whether the rectangular frame of a still photograph or the framing a journalist does writing a news story or feature,” he said. “In VR, there is no frame. You can look wherever you want within the scene. The experience leads to a feeling of connection and empathy that is more powerful than traditional video.”

DECEPTIVE

However, the lack of a narrative frame that makes virtual reality so powerful can lead to ethical questions around its use in journalism.

“It’s certainly fair to ask whether VR — with its more realistic depictions — might be more deceptive [than other forms of journalism],” Tow Center for Digital Journalism analyst Fergus Pitt said. “Audiences, when asked, will say they understand that journalists crafted the work, but the scenes they’ve watched will stay lodged in their minds and maybe their subconscious in a powerful way. That’s a serious responsibility.”

“The pretense of VR is seeing something that actually happened as opposed to something obviously constructed, so authorship is more blurred,” University of British Columbia digital media and global affairs assistant professor Taylor Owen said. “It is a highly constructed environment, but the pretense to the viewer is that it isn’t.”

The Displaced was criticized by some journalists, including National Public Radio (NPR) senior vice president of news Mike Oreskes.

“The computer can generate the impression of being at a crime scene by blending still photos of the scene and video of the area shot later,” he wrote in an e-mail to NPR staff. “This will seem very real, but it might not pass the high standards set by most photojournalists.”

This story has been viewed 2917 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top