Terrorist attacks on civilians, whether the downing over Sinai of a Russian aircraft killing 224 civilian passengers, the horrific Paris massacre claiming 130 innocent lives or the tragic bombing in Ankara that killed 102 peace activists, are crimes against humanity. Their perpetrators — in this case, the Islamic State group — must be stopped. Success will require a clear understanding of the roots of this ruthless network of militants.
Painful as it is to admit, the West, especially the US, bears significant responsibility for creating the conditions in which the Islamic State has flourished. Only a change in US and European foreign policy vis-a-vis the Middle East can reduce the risk of further terrorism.
The recent attacks should be understood as “blowback terrorism” — a dreadful unintended result of repeated US and European covert and overt military actions throughout the Middle East, North Africa, the Horn of Africa and Central Asia that aimed to overthrow governments and install regimes compliant with Western interests. These operations have not only destabilized the targeted regions, causing great suffering; they have also put populations in the US, the EU, Russia and the Middle East at significant risk of terror.
Illustration: Mountain People
The public has never really been told the true history of Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda, or the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Starting in 1979, the CIA mobilized, recruited, trained and armed Sunni young men to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. The CIA recruited widely from Muslim populations (including in Europe) to form the mujahidin, a multinational Sunni fighting force mobilized to oust the Soviet infidel from Afghanistan.
Bin Laden, from a wealthy Saudi family, was brought in to help lead and cofinance the operation. This was typical of CIA operations: relying on improvised funding through a wealthy Saudi family, and proceeds from local smuggling and the narcotics trade.
By promoting the core vision of a jihad to defend the lands of Islam (Dar al-Islam) from outsiders, the CIA produced a hardened fighting force of thousands of young men displaced from their homes and stoked for battle. It is this initial fighting force — and the ideology that motivated it — that today still forms the basis of the Sunni jihadist insurgencies, including the Islamic State. While the militants’ original target was the Soviet Union, today the “infidel” includes the US, Europe (notably France and the UK) and Russia.
At the end of the 1980s, with the Soviet retreat from Afghanistan, some elements of the mujahidin morphed into al-Qaeda, Arabic for “the base,” which referred to the military facilities and training grounds in Afghanistan built for the mujahidin by bin Laden and the CIA. After the Soviet withdrawal, the term al-Qaeda shifted meaning from the specific military base to the organizational base of militant activities.
Blowback against the US began in 1990 with the first Gulf War, when the US created and expanded its military bases in the Dar al-Islam, most notably in Saudi Arabia, the home of Islam’s founding and holiest sites. This expanded US military presence was anathema to the core militant ideology that the CIA had done so much to foster.
The US’ unprovoked war on Iraq in 2003 unleashed the demons. Not only was the war itself launched on the basis of CIA lies; it also aimed to create a Shia-led regime subservient to the US and anathema to the Sunni militants and the many more Sunni Iraqis who were ready to take up arms. More recently, the US, France and the UK toppled Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, and the US worked with the Egyptian generals who ousted the elected Muslim Brotherhood government. In Syria, following Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s violent suppression of peaceful public protests in 2011, the US, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and other regional allies helped to foment a military insurgency that has pushed the country into a downward spiral of chaos and violence.
Such operations have failed — repeatedly and frequently disastrously — to produce legitimate governments or even rudimentary stability. On the contrary, by upending established, albeit authoritarian, governments in Iraq, Libya and Syria and destabilizing Sudan and other parts of Africa deemed hostile to the West, they have done much to fuel chaos, bloodshed and civil war. It is this turmoil that has enabled the Islamic State to capture and defend territory in Syria, Iraq and parts of North Africa.
Three steps are needed to defeat the Islamic State and other violent militants. First, US President Barack Obama should pull the plug on CIA covert operations. The use of the CIA as a secret army of destabilization has a long, tragic history of failure, all hidden from public view under the agency’s cloak of secrecy. Ending CIA-caused mayhem would go far to staunch the instability, violence and anti-Western hatred that fuels today’s terrorism.
Second, the US, Russia and the other permanent members of the UN Security Council should immediately stop their infighting and establish a framework for Syrian peace. They have a shared and urgent stake in confronting the Islamic State; all are victims of the terror. Moreover, military action against the Islamic State can succeed only with the legitimacy and backing of the UN Security Council.
The UN framework should include: an immediate end to the insurgency against al-Assad that the US, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have pursued; a Syrian ceasefire; a UN-mandated military force to confront the Islamic State; and a political transition in Syria dictated not by the US, but by a UN consensus to support a non-violent political reconstruction.
Finally, the long-term solution to regional instability lies in sustainable development. The entire Middle East is beset not only by wars, but also by deepening development failures: intensifying fresh water stress, desertification, high youth unemployment, poor educational systems and other serious blockages.
More wars — especially CIA-backed, Western-led wars — will solve nothing. By contrast, a surge of investment in education, health, renewable energy, agriculture and infrastructure, financed both from within the region and globally, is the real key to building a more stable future for the Middle East and the world.
Jeffrey Sachs is professor of sustainable development, professor of health policy and management and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs