Terrorist attacks on civilians, whether the downing over Sinai of a Russian aircraft killing 224 civilian passengers, the horrific Paris massacre claiming 130 innocent lives or the tragic bombing in Ankara that killed 102 peace activists, are crimes against humanity. Their perpetrators — in this case, the Islamic State group — must be stopped. Success will require a clear understanding of the roots of this ruthless network of militants.
Painful as it is to admit, the West, especially the US, bears significant responsibility for creating the conditions in which the Islamic State has flourished. Only a change in US and European foreign policy vis-a-vis the Middle East can reduce the risk of further terrorism.
The recent attacks should be understood as “blowback terrorism” — a dreadful unintended result of repeated US and European covert and overt military actions throughout the Middle East, North Africa, the Horn of Africa and Central Asia that aimed to overthrow governments and install regimes compliant with Western interests. These operations have not only destabilized the targeted regions, causing great suffering; they have also put populations in the US, the EU, Russia and the Middle East at significant risk of terror.
Illustration: Mountain People
The public has never really been told the true history of Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda, or the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Starting in 1979, the CIA mobilized, recruited, trained and armed Sunni young men to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. The CIA recruited widely from Muslim populations (including in Europe) to form the mujahidin, a multinational Sunni fighting force mobilized to oust the Soviet infidel from Afghanistan.
Bin Laden, from a wealthy Saudi family, was brought in to help lead and cofinance the operation. This was typical of CIA operations: relying on improvised funding through a wealthy Saudi family, and proceeds from local smuggling and the narcotics trade.
By promoting the core vision of a jihad to defend the lands of Islam (Dar al-Islam) from outsiders, the CIA produced a hardened fighting force of thousands of young men displaced from their homes and stoked for battle. It is this initial fighting force — and the ideology that motivated it — that today still forms the basis of the Sunni jihadist insurgencies, including the Islamic State. While the militants’ original target was the Soviet Union, today the “infidel” includes the US, Europe (notably France and the UK) and Russia.
At the end of the 1980s, with the Soviet retreat from Afghanistan, some elements of the mujahidin morphed into al-Qaeda, Arabic for “the base,” which referred to the military facilities and training grounds in Afghanistan built for the mujahidin by bin Laden and the CIA. After the Soviet withdrawal, the term al-Qaeda shifted meaning from the specific military base to the organizational base of militant activities.
Blowback against the US began in 1990 with the first Gulf War, when the US created and expanded its military bases in the Dar al-Islam, most notably in Saudi Arabia, the home of Islam’s founding and holiest sites. This expanded US military presence was anathema to the core militant ideology that the CIA had done so much to foster.
The US’ unprovoked war on Iraq in 2003 unleashed the demons. Not only was the war itself launched on the basis of CIA lies; it also aimed to create a Shia-led regime subservient to the US and anathema to the Sunni militants and the many more Sunni Iraqis who were ready to take up arms. More recently, the US, France and the UK toppled Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, and the US worked with the Egyptian generals who ousted the elected Muslim Brotherhood government. In Syria, following Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s violent suppression of peaceful public protests in 2011, the US, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and other regional allies helped to foment a military insurgency that has pushed the country into a downward spiral of chaos and violence.
Such operations have failed — repeatedly and frequently disastrously — to produce legitimate governments or even rudimentary stability. On the contrary, by upending established, albeit authoritarian, governments in Iraq, Libya and Syria and destabilizing Sudan and other parts of Africa deemed hostile to the West, they have done much to fuel chaos, bloodshed and civil war. It is this turmoil that has enabled the Islamic State to capture and defend territory in Syria, Iraq and parts of North Africa.
Three steps are needed to defeat the Islamic State and other violent militants. First, US President Barack Obama should pull the plug on CIA covert operations. The use of the CIA as a secret army of destabilization has a long, tragic history of failure, all hidden from public view under the agency’s cloak of secrecy. Ending CIA-caused mayhem would go far to staunch the instability, violence and anti-Western hatred that fuels today’s terrorism.
Second, the US, Russia and the other permanent members of the UN Security Council should immediately stop their infighting and establish a framework for Syrian peace. They have a shared and urgent stake in confronting the Islamic State; all are victims of the terror. Moreover, military action against the Islamic State can succeed only with the legitimacy and backing of the UN Security Council.
The UN framework should include: an immediate end to the insurgency against al-Assad that the US, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have pursued; a Syrian ceasefire; a UN-mandated military force to confront the Islamic State; and a political transition in Syria dictated not by the US, but by a UN consensus to support a non-violent political reconstruction.
Finally, the long-term solution to regional instability lies in sustainable development. The entire Middle East is beset not only by wars, but also by deepening development failures: intensifying fresh water stress, desertification, high youth unemployment, poor educational systems and other serious blockages.
More wars — especially CIA-backed, Western-led wars — will solve nothing. By contrast, a surge of investment in education, health, renewable energy, agriculture and infrastructure, financed both from within the region and globally, is the real key to building a more stable future for the Middle East and the world.
Jeffrey Sachs is professor of sustainable development, professor of health policy and management and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
There have been media reports that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) plans to hold military exercises in August to simulate seizing the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. In the past, only Coast Guard Administration (CGA) personnel have been stationed there, but the Ministry of National Defense has dispatched the Republic of China Marine Corps to the islands, nominally for “ex-situ training,” to prevent a Chinese attack under the guise of military drills. The move is only a temporary measure and not sufficiently proactive. Instead, the government should officially declare sovereignty over the islands and station troops
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement