Fifty years ago today, as the American Association for the Advancement of Science highlighted, then-US president Lyndon Johnson’s Science Advisory Committee sent him a report titled Restoring the Quality of Our Environment.
The introduction to the report noted: Pollutants have altered on a global scale the carbon dioxide content of the air and the lead concentrations in ocean waters and human populations.
The report included a section on atmospheric carbon dioxide and climate change, written by prominent climate scientists Roger Revelle, Wallace Broecker, Charles Keeling, Harmon Craig and J. Smagorisnky.
Reviewing the document today, one cannot help but be struck by how well these scientists understood the mechanisms of Earth’s climate change 50 years ago.
The report said that within a few years, climate models would be able to reasonably project future global surface temperature changes.
In 1974, one of its authors, Wallace Broecker, did just that in a paper titled Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming?
His model only included the effects of carbon dioxide and his best estimates of natural climate cycles. It did not include the warming effects of other greenhouse gases, or the cooling effects of human aerosol pollution, but fortunately for Broecker, those two effects have roughly canceled each other out over the past 40 years.
Broecker’s model predicted the global warming anticipated by this year both from carbon pollution alone, and when including his best estimate of natural climate cycles. The climate model predictions from more than 40 years ago turned out to be remarkably accurate.
The 1965 report also debunked a number of myths that climate contrarians continue to repeat to this day. For example, the first section of the climate chapter is titled Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuels — the Invisible Pollutant.
Although the US Supreme Court ruled that carbon dioxide is a pollutant in a landmark 2007 case, many contrarians object to this description. Nevertheless, climate scientists realized a half century ago that human carbon emissions qualify as pollution due to the dangers they pose via climate change.
The report said that although carbon dioxide is an invisible “trace gas” — meaning it comprises a small percentage of the Earth’s atmosphere as a whole — it can nevertheless have significant impacts on the climate at these seemingly low levels.
As the scientists wrote: “Only about one two-thousandth of the atmosphere and one ten-thousandth of the ocean are carbon dioxide. Yet to living creatures, these small fractions are of vital importance Within a few short centuries, we are returning to the air a significant part of the carbon that was slowly extracted by plants and buried in the sediments during half a billion years.”
Contrarians today often repeat the myths that because carbon dioxide is invisible and only a trace gas, it cannot possibly cause significant climate change. This report demonstrates that scientists understood the greenhouse effect better 50 years ago than these contrarians do today.
The report documented the several different lines of evidence that prove the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide is entirely human-caused.
“We can conclude with fair assurance that at the present time, fossil fuels are the only source of CO2 being added to the ocean-atmosphere-biosphere system,” the report said.
This is yet another fact understood by climate scientists 50 years ago that some contrarian scientists, such as Roy Spencer and Judith Curry, continue to cast doubt upon to this day.
The report also projected how much the atmospheric carbon dioxide level would increase in the following decades.
Based on projected world energy requirements, the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (1956) has estimated an amount of fossil fuel combustion by the year 2000 that with our assumed partitions would give about a 25 percent increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, compared with the amount present during the 19th century.
A 25 percent increase from pre-industrial levels would result in about 350 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
The UN underestimated the growth in fossil fuel combustion, because the actual carbon dioxide level in 2000 was 370ppm.
In addition to rising temperatures, the report discussed a variety of “other possible effects of an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide,” including melting of the Antarctic ice cap, rise of sea level, warming of sea water, increased acidity of fresh waters (which also applies to the danger of ocean acidification, global warming’s evil twin) and an increase in plant photosynthesis.
These climate scientists warned Johnson in 1965 not just of the dangers associated with human-caused global warming, but also that we might eventually have to consider geoengineering the climate to offset that warming and the risks that we are causing by inadvertently running a dangerous experiment with the Earth’s climate.
Through their worldwide industrial civilization, humanity are unwittingly conducting a vast geophysical experiment. Within a few generations they have been burning the fossil fuels that slowly accumulated in the earth over the past 500 million years.
The climatic changes that may be produced by the increased carbon dioxide content could be deleterious from the point of view of human beings. The possibilities of deliberately bringing about countervailing climatic changes therefore need to be thoroughly explored.
Fifty years later, the impending Paris international climate negotiations represent our last chance to heed the expert counsel about the dangers posed by human-caused climate change before we are fully committed to the deleterious consequences that climate scientists have been warning us about for a half century.
That is why more than 1,500 academics from around the world have signed an open letter asking world leaders and delegates at Paris to take vigorous action now to avoid a future of catastrophic global warming.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under