FAPA opposes Xi meeting
The Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) — a Taiwanese-American grassroots organization based in Washington — wants to express its deep concern about the sudden announcement that Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) are scheduled to meet in Singapore [today].
That the plans for the meeting were kept under wraps until the last minute is symptomatic of the undemocratic “black box” approach the Ma government has been following for years. The lack of transparency in governance was already evident when the Ma administration tried to push through the ill-fated service trade agreement in March last year and the changes in history textbooks earlier this year. In both cases, the matters led to large-scale protests.
The short notice for the meeting also flies in the face of the “no surprises” approach President Ma promised — in particular vis-a-vis the US — when conducting policy on cross-strait issues: His announcement on Nov. 7 that he would meet Xi in Singapore is a big surprise.
What are the main drivers prompting this move by Ma?
First, he is trying to salvage his legacy. As his standing in the polls is way down, he feels he needs to do something drastic to polish his image. He is generally considered a down-and-out, has-been politician. Very few people outside his own little circle believe in him anymore.
Second, he is trying to turn the tide in the Jan. 16 presidential election, where the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), with its presidential candidate, Eric Chu (朱立倫), is still way behind Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in the opinion polls.
Chu’s manipulation of the ouster of the KMT’s previous candidate, Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), did not earn him much credit and his ratings have stayed at around the same level as Hung’s.
Third, he wants to pin Tsai down on the cross-strait issue and restrict her future options by agreeing with Xi that cross-strait “stability” cannot be guaranteed unless she embraces the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Many see the “1992 consensus” as a slippery slope toward unification. They want to keep all options open for the nation, and want Taiwanese to decide their future openly and freely.
In FAPA’s view, “peace and stability” is only artificial, as it is predicated on the fact that Ma has given China the impression that Taiwan is inexorably drifting in its direction. As is clear from opinion polls that is simply not the case: Taiwanese prefer democracy and freedom.
FAPA believes that:
First, the timing and the manner this meeting came about is not conducive to a balanced and responsible debate on future relations with China. With his approach, Ma is attempting to pre-empt a DPP government from exploring directions that would provide better guarantees for Taiwan’s future as a free and democratic nation.
Second, it is inappropriate for a lame-duck president to engage in such a meeting only two months before presidential and legislative elections. There is obviously no consensus in the nation on how to move forward on cross-strait relations and Ma does not have any mandate. On the contrary, his pro-China policies have been soundly rejected in both last year’s nine-in-one elections and in recent opinion polls.
Third, a truly fruitful and productive meeting between leaders from the two sides can only be held in due time, after the nation has reached a consensus on future cross-strait relations in a transparent and open process.
Formosan Association for Public Affairs
Washington
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations