Pension reform suggestions
Next year there could be a change in the ruling party. Reform of the pension system for public employees — retired military personnel, public-school teachers and civil servants — has again become the focus of fierce debate. As a retired member of the military, I would like to offer my humble opinion on the subject.
First, consideration should be given to a clearer differentiation between working and retired people. Under the current system, the difference in the amount paid out to retirees and those actively working is small. Thus, after retirement, many people do nothing but wait for the money to roll in. There is no deterrent to retirement. If the gap between the two were greater — for example canceling the monthly subsidies that retired personnel receive for their children’s education and halting the increases to monthly pension payments in line with current wage adjustments in the job they retired from, or only giving increments up to a certain level — then there would be an incentive for personnel to put off retirement.
Second, currently there is a regulation that public-sector employees who take another public-sector job at “grade one” level after they retire temporarily stop getting their monthly pensions.
I think this should be modified to extend it to the private sector as well. For example, if public-sector retirees have any income up to public-servant grade-one level or the basic wage, then the payment of a monthly pension should be suspended.
I have seen a lot of people retire at the minimum statutory standard. Some even produce strange medical evidence for their retirement. However, as soon as they retire, they seem to undergo a second spring in their career, and take up job opportunities, proving that they are still able to work.
That being the case, suspending their pensions seems reasonable.
Furthermore, government finances are already stretched to their limit, so now is the time for unreasonable measures to be reformed. Such as, paying teachers according to their educational qualifications.
According to the current system, if high-school or elementary-school teachers have a master’s degree or doctorate, they are paid a higher salary. This raises the cost of pensions.
Perhaps in the past there were reasons for the system, but today, access to higher education has increased dramatically, and the case for abolition needs to be reviewed.
The South Korean government has reformed its system so that fewer retirees are able to take pensions at the level of their pre-retirement salaries.
If a nation whose financial situation is so far ahead of Taiwan’s can take such drastic measures, then why do those in power here continue to be shackled by the old system?
They seem to be incapable of thinking outside the box.
Hung Ping-chih
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.