The nation’s economic outlook follows the same cycle every year: At the beginning of the year, the government gets everyone’s hopes up with bright predictions, but a few months later, as disappointing export figures and declining consumer confidence appear, it starts to make downward adjustments to growth predictions. By the end of the year, the figures are downright depressing, but that is okay; a new year is beginning and the government once again rolls out its optimistic forecasts to make everyone happy again.
This year has been no exception. The government last week announced that the economy contracted in the third quarter, shrinking 1.01 percent from the same period last year. This is bad news for the nation and even worse news for the ruling party in the run-up to the Jan. 16 presidential and legislative elections.
The government’s response to the slump was to rush out a stimulus package, promising more than NT$4 billion (US$122.2 million) in subsidies to boost consumer spending.
The package includes measures in four categories: energy and water conservation, digital life, promoting online shopping, and travel. They involve subsidizing the purchase of energy and water conservation products and mechanized gardening equipment, improving broadband facilities, upgrading 2G mobile phone users to 4G, online promotions and hotel reservations. The government is to spend the entire stimulus package on the subsidies in the period from Saturday through Feb. 29, in the hope of boosting GDP to the tune of NT$15.4 billion.
Many nations seeking to boost their economies implement either monetary or fiscal policies, such as increasing government spending on infrastructure projects to boost investments. Public investments can create a considerable multiplier effect, improve infrastructure and can lay the groundwork for improved competitiveness. Another option would be to increase consumer spending by subsidizing expenses or reducing taxes.
The government has set its sights on boosting consumer spending, although some suspect that the package would not do much good.
Why are they so pessimistic? Because the government tried a similar approach in 2009, when the world was still reeling from the 2008 financial crisis, raising NT$85.8 billion in government debt to distribute vouchers to every ID card holder. Unfortunately, the plan’s contribution to the economy was a third of what had been projected. The remaining 60 to 70 percent was claimed by the substitution effect: People mostly used the vouchers to pay for what they would have bought with cash. The outcome was that the government incurred additional debt of NT$85.8 billion to boost GDP by a mere NT$30 billion. Had this money been used on infrastructure projects instead, it would have created more than NT$100 billion in value, even with a multiplier ratio of only 1.3 to 1.5.
The government is planning to spend more than NT$4 billion to boost GDP by NT$15.4 billion. Even though the stimulus package comes in the form of partial subsidies to leverage consumer spending, once the substitution effect is taken into account, NT$15.4 billion sounds optimistic. Considering that GDP is NT$15.5 trillion, boosting it by a factor of 0.001 is a drop in the ocean.
Granted, the government is in a bit of a bind. The coffers are empty and so is the administration’s bag of tricks. It is feeling the pressure from the looming elections. Coming up with an effective stimulus package this late in the game is not easy.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under