When politicians announce their decisions to run for president, a great deal of information about them is revealed, including their core values and their take on ongoing problems, in addition to their planned reforms and other objectives that drive them to pursue their candidacy.
On Oct. 17, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman and presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) gave the perfect example of how not to launch a presidential campaign. It is not so much that Chu has replaced Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) — the party’s original candidate — by abusing procedural justice as party chairman. Neither is it about his betrayal of the residents of New Taipei City, of which he is mayor, though he has taken time off from the role ahead of January’s election. Rather, it is his unwillingness to reflect on the KMT’s errors, his flawed value judgements, and his failure to get a grip on the nation’s problems and their causes.
Chu said he is running for president because he wants the next generation to be better off than the current generation and for the future to be more hopeful than today.
He also said that if the KMT cannot win the election and secure a majority of seats in the legislature, the nation’s future would be lost.
He seems to have forgotten that, over the past seven years, Taiwanese have twice given the KMT the authority to govern in presidential elections. What they received in return was not a better life or a more hopeful future, but a depressing tomorrow; so depressing that there is hardly any future left for the next generation.
Is Chu so inept that he cannot see this? Issues closely related to social and generational justice — such as tax and year-end bonus reform — were not mentioned in his speech. Does he really care about the younger generation’s future?
Chu said that he decided to break his promise to New Taipei City residents as their mayor and run for president because he wanted to safeguard democracy and let the nation’s next generation enjoy a healthy democracy.
Does he know that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has repeatedly chosen to be at odds with the public? Legislators of the KMT — the majority party in the legislature — have repeatedly preferred to be Ma’s lackeys; they disregarded public opinion and listened to his. When Ma went against the Constitution and the executive exercised its power in a perverse manner, KMT lawmakers did nothing to stop it. They neglected their duty to supervise and provide a counterbalance to the government, as invested by the Constitution. Is this the kind of democracy Chu wants to safeguard?
When Chu mentioned constitutional and legislative reform, he admitted that the constitutional system is flawed in that power is not matched with an equal level of responsibility. Yet he failed to explain why the KMT has repeatedly blocked proposals to reform the legislature’s responsibility of oversight, as proposed by academics and civic groups.
He knows that the legislature cannot effectively counterbalance the executive, as seen in the cross-strait agreement oversight bill and the revision to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法).
Also, a proposal to increase the transparency of the legislature by setting up a TV channel for the public to supervise lawmakers has been rejected by KMT legislators.
Perhaps the democracy that Chu has in mind is the kind in which KMT Legislator Chang Ching-chung (張慶忠) pushed through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 30 seconds, or the kind in which lawmakers passed the amendment to the Accounting Act (會計法) in the middle of the night to avoid criminal charges against certain politicians. If the KMT is unwilling to implement even the most fundamental of reforms, how can the public believe it is serious about constitutional reform?
How many Taiwanese still believe that the KMT would reflect upon itself, as Chu claimed it would? Judging by Ma’s Double Ten National Day address, there is not much reflection going on.
If Chu truly wants to make a fresh start, he should at least give a comprehensive review of the Ma administration’s mistakes before proposing new policies. He should also come clean about the mistakes that the KMT has made.
If Chu can do that, he could have a chance to find guidance to move forward, despite his pointless speech. Otherwise, Taiwanese might as well let the KMT fall into utter ruin, for only then will the nation have a real future.
Huang Kuo-chang is chairman of the New Power Party and one of the party’s legislative candidates.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.