Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has sparked fresh controversy by saying that he was against depressing the housing market, leading many to accuse him of backpedaling on his housing policies, but he has a point when he says that bringing down housing prices would have grave consequences.
First of all, while prospective buyers in Taipei say that housing prices have risen steeply over the years and need to be adjusted downward, more than 70 percent of Taipei residents who already own a house disagree.
With costs rising much faster than housing prices, it would have been amazing if housing prices had remained on the same level they were three years ago. As commodity prices rise, so do the costs of building homes, and it is only natural that the housing market reflects these hikes.
With everything costing more these days, it would be unfair to the majority of Taipei residents who own houses if real-estate prices were forced down, as it would make them suffer considerable financial losses.
A downward adjustment would also defeat the government’s role as facilitator to help people buy houses at more reasonable prices, as homeowners would be less likely to put their properties up for sale. Conversely, it would only make them cling tighter to their properties and wait for prices to rebound, thus creating a holdup in the market.
Also at risk are construction companies, who would be forced to sell homes at prices lower than what they had expected to earn.
Both situations would hurt housing liquidity, leading to a potential holdup in the market and, in a worst-case scenario, contribute to a collapse of the banking sector.
As witnessed in the later stages of the US subprime mortgage crisis almost 10 years ago, a sharp decline in prices would tempt borrowers to default on their mortgage-backed securities due to negative equity, which occurs when the value of the houses they mortgaged falls to less than what they owe to the banks.
If real-estate prices are examined from a broader perspective, it is obvious that Taipei is not the only city with expensive properties, as it is the norm in all advanced cities worldwide.
As the city that boasts the most job opportunities and the most abundant resources, Taipei has a far higher demand for homes than any other city in the nation, and prices always increase when supplies are strained.
Even if the situation called for the government to take measures to prevent the real-estate bubble from bursting, it would need to be carried out in a gradual process that prevents a slump in the housing market.
The best way to bring down Taipei’s housing prices would be to boost the development of industries in other cities to make for a more even distribution of resources, which would be a time-consuming effort.
That said, there is still a glimmer of hope for young people who wish to live comfortably in Taipei.
Ko has pledged to build 50,000 public housing units for Taipei residents in eight years and Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has promised to build 200,000 units nationwide.
If the two can make good on their promises, young people who live in appalling dwellings, such as illegally built rooftop additions or cramped rooms divided from a home, would be able to live in high-quality homes for several years on rents that are equivalent to or slightly higher than the market value, as they save up to buy their own property.
People who say that the government should make housing in Taipei available to all young people need to put things into perspective and realize that such a thing is unlikely to happen in the foreseeable future.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs