When Rosangela Araujo turned 44, she decided that she had worked long enough.
So Araujo, a public school supervisor, did what millions of other Brazilians in their 40s and 50s have done: She retired, with a full pension.
“I had to take advantage of the benefit that was available to me,” said Araujo, now 65.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
Her government pension stands at about US$1,000 a month, five times the minimum wage.
An exploding pension crisis in Brazil is wreaking havoc on its public finances, intensifying a political struggle over the economy that already has the president fighting for survival.
Brazilians retire at an average age of 54, and some public servants, military officials and politicians manage to collect multiple pensions totaling more than US$100,000 a year. Then, once they die, loopholes enable their spouses or daughters to go on collecting the pensions for the rest of their lives, too.
The phenomenon is so common in Brazil’s vast public bureaucracy that some scholars call it the “Viagra effect” — retired civil servants, many in their 60s or 70s, wed to much younger women who are entitled to the full pensions for decades after their spouses are gone.
“Think Greece, but on a crazier, more colossal scale,” said Paulo Tafner, an economist and a leading authority on Brazil’s pension system.
“The entire country should be frightened to its core,” he said. “The pensions Brazilians obtain and the ages at which they start receiving them are nothing less than scandalous.”
The pension crisis is feeding the nation’s political turmoil as Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff fights calls for her ouster.
The nation’s economy has soured badly and this month the Brazilian Federal Court of Accounts ruled that Rousseff violated accounting practices by using funds from giant state banks to cover budget shortfalls. School and health budgets are being slashed and Rousseff is now proposing steps to keep pension spending from ballooning even more.
However, a rebellious Brazilian Congress voted this year to significantly expand pension benefits. Rousseff vetoed the legislation, setting the stage for a bruising battle with lawmakers. Some of the president’s allies view the showdown as part of her opponents’ strategy to impeach her.
Still, economists warn that the pension crisis would grow more acute regardless of whether Rousseff stays in office, ranking it among Brazil’s most vexing structural binds. Officials had expected a major shortfall in 2030, but they now say that could happen as soon as next year.
Brazil is enduring its sharpest economic downturn in decades, hemorrhaging jobs and depleting contributions to the pension system. The nation’s Federal Revenue Service said such payments plunged 9 percent in August.
Then there is Brazil’s plummeting fertility rate — which recently dropped to 1.77 children per woman, below the rate needed for the population to replace itself — which would eventually put even more pressure on a pension system already under intense strain.
This shift partly reflects higher living standards in recent decades and broader availability of birth control, but it would result in fewer young people to support a much larger older population. As recently as 1980, Brazil’s fertility rate was 4.3 children per woman, according to the UN.
More so, the average life expectancy in Brazil climbed to 74.9 years in 2013, from 62.5 years in 1980, according to government statistics. Instead of building a surplus now to prepare for an onslaught of new pension obligations, observers say Brazil is squandering a demographic bonus that would soon fade.
Economists note that Brazil already spends more than 10 percent of its GDP on public pensions, similar to what southern European nations with much older populations have recently spent, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Unless changes are made, an even bigger shock is expected in Brazil, given that the population of people 60 or older is expected to reach about 14 percent of the overall population in just two decades, up from about 7 percent now.
The biggest challenge that political leaders across the ideological spectrum face is one they helped create: the generosity of Brazilian pensions.
Some authorities have occasionally taken a stab at the issue, trying to raise the retirement age to 65 for men and 60 for women, prevent young widows from easily receiving their deceased husbands’ pensions, or stop many in the private sector from receiving their full salaries as public pensions.
Nonetheless, loopholes flourish, making it relatively easy for Brazilians to retire much younger, often with public pensions equivalent to their full salaries. Brazilian men now retire at an average age of 55, while men in Greece retire on average at the age of 63.
The pension system can ease extreme poverty. For instance, rural workers can retire five years before others even if they have never contributed to the public pension system, receiving a monthly payment equal to the minimum wage, about US$210 a month.
However, the system also perpetuates inequality by providing special benefits to hundreds of thousands of government employees and their families.
In 2000, for instance, officials did away with rules allowing the daughters of military officials to receive the pensions of their fathers after they died.
However, the shift applied only to new entrants into the armed forces, so more than 185,000 women still draw military survivors’ pensions, often amounting to the full salaries of their fathers upon retirement. Spending on such pensions is forecast to last through the end of this century, economists say.
This kind of benefit is widespread enough throughout the public bureaucracy that Brazil is estimated to spend about 3 percent of its GDP on survivors’ pensions, about three times the level in many rich industrialized nations.
Politicians have been especially skilled at securing big pensions at the state level.
In the Amazonian state of Para, former governors and first ladies were recently receiving lifelong pensions as high as US$7,000 a month, even if they served only a few years in office. Brazil’s Supreme Federal Tribunal suspended such pensions this year.
Other states are struggling with similar payouts. In the state of Rio de Janeiro, the authorities had relied on royalties from offshore oil production before oil prices fell sharply in recent months. Officials in Rio are now preparing a bailout to transfer about US$500 million from the state treasury to cover this year’s shortfall in the pension system.
With Rio’s pension obligations soaring, that means there are fewer resources for basic services like schools, hospitals, policing and sewage systems. Rio is planning to spend about US$4.5 billion this year on pension benefits, compared with about US$3.6 billion on the state’s public education and health systems, officials said.
“Brazil has three very clear options to prevent large increases in pension spending: increase contributions, increase the retirement age, or decrease pensions,” said Mariano Bosch, a labor markets specialist at the Inter-American Development Bank. “All of those options are very unpopular,” she said.
So far, political leaders do not seem prepared to embrace any of those options. Instead, Brazilian Finance Minister Joaquim Levy is seeking to resuscitate a broadly unpopular tax on financial transactions in an effort to close the pension deficit.
Well-organized pensioners’ unions are rejecting calls to scale back benefits.
“Making retirees pay the price is just not fair,” said Joao Pimenta, 63, a former director of a shopkeepers’ association who retired at the age of 49 and regularly leads protests against pension cuts in Brazil’s capital, Brasilia.
“Why isn’t the economic elite being called upon to sacrifice? I’m sick of hearing that normal people need to pay the price with their pensions,” he said.
Some analysts hope that Brazil’s political battles can open the way for pension solutions. Others say that the crisis might actually have the opposite effect by emboldening Rousseff’s opponents who are aggressively seeking to expand pension benefits.
If Rousseff is ousted, political analysts point out, her governing Workers’ Party would move into the opposition, potentially encouraging it to mobilize the same unions that view overhauling the pension system as an abomination.
“Public pensions in Brazil have long been a slow-motion disaster,” said Raul Velloso, a specialist on public finances. “The difference now is that the debacle is accelerating, revealing to our children the political cowardice and irresponsibility our leaders are bestowing on them.”
Additional reporting by Paula Moura
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations