According to reports, Tainan City Council Speaker Lee Chuan-chiao (李全教) on Oct. 13 announced that the council had accepted a public petition to provide national compensation for the dengue fever outbreak.
On Oct. 15, a meeting was convened, during which a participant said that “the compensation for dengue fever outbreak should be a social compensation,” and that “in accordance with distributive justice, there should be a limit to the amount of compensation.”
Another said that “the out-of-control dengue fever outbreak in Tainan is of human origin and it is only fair that the victims should be granted compensation.”
The question of whether dengue fever qualifies for compensation as a natural disaster or as an artificial one depends on the legal basis for compensation, the distribution of the nation’s fiscal resources and whether government officials have acted illegally and irresponsibly. The issues must first be clarified.
First, whether an event is a natural or an artificial disaster should be determined by its cause. Typhoons, earthquakes and other disasters caused by the forces of nature are natural disasters, whereas events caused by people are artificial. One obvious example of an artificial disaster is the explosion and the ensuing fire at the Formosa Fun Coast (八仙海岸) water park in New Taipei City.
It is equally obvious that the cause of dengue fever is not artificial, but natural. As to the effectiveness of preventive measures, that would depend on disaster management after the event takes place and therefore should not be confused with the cause.
Second, the effectiveness of preventive measures is not necessarily the result of government officials being careless. The effectiveness of the Tainan City Government’s preventive measures depends not only on whether the central and local government’s resources are effectively integrated and applied, but also on whether the public is cooperative in maintaining environmental hygiene and protecting themselves from mosquito bites.
Solely using the outcomes of preventive measures to determine whether government officials are doing their jobs is clearly subjective and therefore not a fair judgement.
Third, dengue fever should qualify for natural disaster compensation rather than national compensation.
When the public is suffering, the government should provide assistance. Article 2 of the Public Assistance Act (社會救助法) says that “the public assistance referred to in this act is divided into living support, medical subsidies, and emergency and disaster aid.” According to Article 2, Tainan residents who have suffered from flooding, fire, hail, typhoons, droughts, earthquakes and other disasters should be provided with disaster relief assistance.
However, it is not clear what kind of disasters qualify as “other disasters.”
Even the Disaster Prevention and Rescue Act (災害防救法) introduced by the central government does not give a clear definition. Although a revision to Article 2 was proposed by the Ministry of the Interior in 2011 to include disasters caused by pathogens, animal and plant plagues, radiation and so on, the revision has not been passed to this day. Since there are no clear regulations in current legislation, perhaps the regulations on emergency assistance in the Public Assistance Act can be applied to provide aid.
In the face of ruthless attacks from nature, what should be done is to do all that can be done with humility to alleviate the after-effects, instead of capitalizing on the public’s misery to gain political advantage.
Hsu Hui-feng is a professor of law at the Chinese Culture University.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under