He has ruled his nation for 35 years, albeit increasingly through the use of systematic violence and torture, run one of Africa’s most prosperous nations to a state of economic collapse and hyperinflation of 250 million percent, and lowered the life expectancy of his people by about one-third. Nevertheless, the China International Peace Research Center has decided that Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe deserved to be named this year’s Confucius (孔子) Peace Prize recipient.
However, even for the committee that selected Russian President Vladimir Putin as a previous winner (2011) and former Cuban president Fidel Castro last year, Mugabe appeared to be a difficult choice to swallow. According to Liu Zhiqin (劉志勤) — the banker who in 2010 proposed the establishment of the prize as a riposte to the Nobel Peace Prize being given to Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) — only 36 of the award committee’s 76 members voted for Mugabe.
Liu said that Mugabe has been in power for such a long time that he “could easily be labeled a dictator, tyrant or despot.”
However, the committee’s press release was revoltingly effusive, saying that since becoming president Mugabe had “worked hard to bring political and economic order to the nation and to improve the welfare of the ... people by overcoming hardship.”
Qiao Damo (譙達摩), who heads the center and is the award committee’s chairman, said Mugabe had injected “fresh energy” into the global quest for harmony, adding that without Mugabe, Zimbabwe “would be facing great difficulty — even public security might be in danger,” but instead it is “a very stable nation.”
Qiao needs to get out of the center’s Hong Kong office more often. Perhaps only in China — or maybe the Central Asian republics — would the kind of economic and social dissolution seen in Zimbabwe over the past two decades count as stability.
Mugabe is the longest-serving leader of an African nation, but he did not get there by being nice or caring for more than those outside his close cadre of supporters. The only stability he has been able to maintain is his hold on power, and it has taken force, murder and blatant political machinations to do so.
According to the Guardian newspaper, documents released earlier this year appear to substantiate the long-held belief that Mugabe was the prime architect of the Gukurahundi massacres of the Ndebele people in the early 1980s that left more than 20,000 dead.
The UN’s World Food Programme said that Zimbabwe ranks 156 out of 187 developing nations on the Global Hunger Index, which measures progress and failure in the fight against hunger. That is not a recipe for stability — or the sign of good governance.
Mugabe, who spent 11 years as a political prisoner, deserves praise for his role in the 1979 Lancaster House Agreement that led to Zimbabwe’s independence, but he has long since squandered the goodwill and respect that achievement earned him.
Microsoft founder Bill Gates and South Korean President Park Geun-hye were mentioned as shortlisted contenders for the prize. They should thank their lucky stars that their names are not being added to the list of dubious achievers that include former vice president Lien Chan (2010), former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan and Chinese rice researcher Yuan Longping (袁龍萍) (2012) and Yi Cheng (一誠), head of the Chinese Buddhist Association (2013).
Previous winners appear embarrassed to have their names linked to the prize; few have shown up to collect their 500,000 yuan (US$78,700) and gold trophy.
However, perhaps the one who would be most ashamed is Confucius, who laid out the three keys to good leadership: “be virtuous above all else,” “rule wisely and fairly,” and “think, then act decisively.” Mugable, like the other politicians who won the prize before him, fails abysmally on all three.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations