The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has had a falling out. Party members have been shouting at the top of their lungs in feverish tones, providing a colorful display of the unique “Chinese temperament.”
The old guard has said loud and clear that deposing the KMT’s former presidential candidate Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) would sound the death knell of the party, while KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) acknowledged that the the wrong candidate was chosen in the first place and put himself forward as the only person who could replace Hung.
Chu lauded his conspiracy to oust Hung as “saving the nation and fighting for the survival of the party.”
Hung became of central importance to the party: Removing her would kill the KMT, but keeping her would finish it as well.
A slow disintegration of the KMT has been taking place for some time. Following the nation’s democratization, the KMT has been slowly decomposing, although the process has been somewhat different from the fall of communism in Eastern European countries, when Soviet-backed regimes fell overnight.
Before democratization, the KMT relied on martial law, monopolization of political resources, divide-and-rule tactics against ethnic groups and buying off interest groups to control the nation. After democratization, it started to rely on the stabilizing influence of former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) localization policies, but splits within the party happened nevertheless.
KMT members opposed to Lee left the party, followed by pro-localists who had joined the party holding their noses. Others left due to ideological differences or unequal treatment within the party.
One only needs to look at the seating arrangement of the Double Ten National Day celebrations to see how the KMT has split over the years. Four former KMT politicians, now chairpersons of rival parties, stood together in a single line, alongside Chu as head of the KMT: People First Party Chairman and presidential candidate James Soong (宋楚瑜) and New Party Chairman Yok Mu-ming (郁慕明) — who left the KMT to form their own parties — Taiwan Solidarity Union Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) and Republican Party Chairperson Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩).
However, compared with the previous splits, the KMT is now showing signs of acute disintegration.
During the presidential primaries, many in the party secretly plotted against Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) to prevent him from running for president. The party pretended to be following a “democratic” process, but was promoting Hung from behind the scenes — a candidate who was not only woefully unqualified for the job, but also advocating a speedy “eventual unification” with China. This left the localist faction within the party as nothing more than an accessory.
However, no longer willing to be ordered about, it set the wheels in motion to get rid of Hung.
Hung’s supporters within the party are a small, rowdy and colorful bunch, who make a great deal of noise. Those who favored removing Hung were in a strong position, but had limited demands. Chu only needed to satisfy the minimum demands of the localists to be allowed to “save the nation and the party.”
Taiwanese are now to wait and see if Hung’s supporters beat a dignified retreat and quit the party. Come next year’s Double Ten National Day celebrations, there could be further additions to the ranks of former KMT members.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under