The Chinese government and Hong Kong’s wealthiest man, the much-admired Li Ka-shing (李嘉誠), have been waging an acidic spat — one that increasingly looks like a bitter divorce being played out in tabloid newspapers. Chinese media have been directing a relentless stream of vitriol at Li.
His “crime?” Buying low in Europe and selling high in China — that is, acting like an investor.
The trigger for this wave of scorn was Li’s sell-off of some of his prime Shanghai properties, after relocating his corporate registry from Hong Kong to the Cayman Islands. This is a completely mundane and rational business decision, aimed at minimizing tax obligations. About 70 percent of all Hong Kong-listed companies have a Caribbean registry and even a number of major Chinese companies, including Internet business Alibaba Group Holding, are registered in off-shore tax havens.
However, in the Chinese media’s puerile narrative, the move exposes Li as “ungrateful” and “unpatriotic.” He is “abandoning” China — which, it is claimed, enabled him to rise from extreme poverty to become one of the world’s wealthiest men — when the nation needs him most.
This absurd account neglects the fact that Li was already one of the world’s wealthiest people before he invested in China. Perhaps more importantly, it fails to recognize that Li’s Chinese land holdings still amount to more than 20 million square meters — nearly a quarter of the size of Manhattan — and that the number of retail outlets he owns in China has increased by 70 percent in two years.
However, the facts are irrelevant. This is a matter of politics. As China attempts to tighten its grip on Hong Kong, Li is showing independence and China’s new rulers — who, true to their communist roots, believe firmly in top-down control — do not like it one bit.
The ongoing squabble represents a significant shift in Li’s relationship with Beijing. A former adviser to Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) and confidante of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民, whose political influence is now waning), Li was among the first to invest in China after the Tiananmen Square Massacre of 1989.
He long touted the motto: “I don’t do anything against China’s interest and I don’t say anything that may hurt China’s reputation.”
That changed in 2012, when Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) was appointed Hong Kong chief executive. China’s first choice for the position, Henry Tang (唐英年), was forced to withdraw because of private indiscretions and a disgraceful bid to have his wife take the fall for a zoning violation.
Leung became China’s man in Hong Kong, responsible for doing Beijing’s bidding — including taking an uncompromising position against pro-democracy protests by students and intellectuals. Even as China’s agenda in Hong Kong has become increasingly tough — and thus unpopular locally — Leung has proved himself to be absolutely loyal to Chinese rulers.
However, Li stood by Tang. More problematic, he has occasionally dissented publicly from Leung’s various misguided policies. As any student of the People’s Republic of China knows, expressions of political disagreement, however mild, can be lethal. There is no “agree to disagree” in China; once the leader has spoken, there is only “obey.”
In Li’s case, the stakes are particularly high. Unlike most of Hong Kong’s tycoons, who are considered excessively focused on political expedience, Li is viewed as a person of strong conscience and thus worthy of considerable respect. He even enjoys the affectionate nickname “Superman.”
However, Beijing, through Leung, is pushing potentially disastrous policies aimed, in Chinese Communist Party parlance, at “de-colonizing” Hong Kong. For example, officials declared that judicial independence and the separation of powers are “colonial” legacies that should be discarded, with Beijing and Hong Kong’s chief executive, not the local courts, calling all the shots.
In this moment of transition, dissent from someone of Li’s standing could have precisely the kind of destabilizing impact that Chinese leaders fear. So Li has to be “de-deified.”
China’s attacks have pushed Li, after almost three weeks of stony silence, to do something he had never done before: strike back. Not only did he point out that all of the accusations about his intentions to abandon China were false; he openly accused Beijing of using tactics from the Cultural Revolution that left him “trembling with fear” and sent “shivers down the spine.”
Li concluded his statement with the message, delivered via three lines by two canonical Chinese poets from the ancient Tang and Song dynasties, that his home was where he felt safe.
The subtext to any literate Chinese was clear: “China may be my ancestral country, but I am a free man, free to choose my home.”
Li, an avid reader of world history and literature, has apparently not taken to heart the lesson that so many Chinese have learned, through great personal tragedies, since 1949.
The core values of the Chinese government are not informed by the humane civility of Tang or Song poets, but by the twisted dialectics of Marxism-Leninism and the amoral militaristic tradition of a party that still cherishes its often brutish and violent habits of governance.
As Chinese leaders continue to push for more control over Hong Kong, spinal shivers are likely to become an increasingly common feature of life there.
Shaw Sin-ming, a private investor, was recently a visiting scholar at the University of Michigan.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.