Shanghai, China’s financial capital, enjoys a double skyline. The city proper, or “old city,” sports a fascinating mix of colonial buildings and modern architecture. The “New Area” of Pudong on the east bank of the Huangpu River hosts Shanghai’s four tallest structures.
In contrast, a couple decades ago there were few buildings in Shanghai, commercial or residential, racing skyward. Pudong was mostly empty, with more brush and trash blowing down the streets than buildings with people working in them.
Beijing has undergone a similar transformation. The streets are lined with gleaming modern buildings. The traffic jams are constant and extraordinary. With the profusion of malls, luxury retailers, sports cars and fashionably dressed Chinese, this is not Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Beijing.
Yet there is another China. For example, the city of Taiyuan, capital of Shanxi Province, about 400km from Beijing. Taiyuan hosts significant new construction and even sports a luxury Kempinski Hotel.
However, while prospering, Taiyuan remains much lower than Beijing or Shanghai on the growth curve.
More distant towns offer a glimpse into the past — more traditional, less advanced, more isolated. Shift to the nearby countryside and incomes drop substantially, averaging less than US$2,000 per capita. There are remains of an ancient fortress and the Great Wall, accessible only by walking along dirt roads lined by homes constructed with bricks taken from the ruins. The primitive toilet had holes in the wooden floor, through which the ground was visible.
However, while poor, the residents, too, were increasingly better off. The main street sported two stores with modern food and sundries. A farmer was leading two cows with one hand while speaking on his cellphone in the other.
Much depends on the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) future. Political and business leaders alike agree that economic development remains Beijing’s priority. As evident in its countryside, China remains a relatively poor developing state and continued economic growth is the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) principal claim to legitimacy.
National pride mixes with personal frustration over government restrictions on liberty. Virtually everyone, including CCP officials, publicly affirm the importance of democratic values and human rights.
However, they soon follow with warnings against threats of disunity and the sort of chaos evident in the Arab Spring.
Younger Chinese speak with horror of what their parents went through during the Cultural Revolution. Criticism of government policy is freely expressed in conversation. Censorship and repression usually appear only when such sentiments are magnified through social or traditional media.
No one outside of government seems happy with Internet restrictions. However, some people noted that bans on sites such as Twitter, YouTube, and the New York Times were of interest mostly to elites who speak English, and these people are most able to circumvent such restrictions.
While there are Western-style liberals in China, some intellectuals and others view freedom through a different, they say Chinese, prism. Some reject US-style democracy without exactly affirming CCP-led autocracy.
Nationalism governs how people view relations with the US. No one in the PRC wants conflict with Washington. Although China’s military power is growing, that of the US is unmatched. Moreover, Beijing policymakers are aware of the close economic connection between the two nations, which has proved to be so profitable for the PRC. Still, virtually everyone backs their government’s broad territorial claims in the Asia-Pacific.
Despite everything, it is hard not to come away from visiting China with a sense of hope. The country is so much more prosperous than before, which increases Beijing’s stake in a stable international order.
The PRC also is freer, despite the recent crackdown on dissent. Religion is spreading despite attempts to reduce its visibility. Criticism is widespread, even though such views cannot be broadcast.
While Chinese international power is undoubtedly increasing, Beijing will remain constrained by poverty, demography and geography. A more assertive foreign and military policy has encouraged the PRC’s neighbors to arm themselves, cooperate with their neighbors and move toward the US, a dubious trifecta for China.
Both sides need to work to maintain peace. In Shanghai, the Chinese have built a modern, world-class city out of colonial humiliation. Yet citizens of the one-time oppressors are joining to create a prosperous city.
Today, Shanghai is a natural in its new financial role, just like London and New York. Hopefully its success, and that of the rest of China, will help keep the Chinese focused on building a peaceful future.
Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institue and a former special assistant to former US president Ronald Reagan.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry