Imagining better education
I agree with Herbert Hanreich’s thesis; Taiwan’s education system is in crisis (“Empty phrases pollute education,” Sept. 29, page 8).
That being said, this is a worldwide phenomenon. Education systems everywhere are failing students. Why? There are many answers put forward with solutions. However, few seem to galvanize the minds of young people. International unemployment for people under the age of 25 is nearing 25 percent. Negative statistics are omnipresent. I take a more pragmatic approach to solving the problem.
Begin with the practical reality. We are not going to change the mindset of bureaucrats and parents without a pedagogical revolution. Authority figures have been immersed in a US-style system that has been coupled with Confucian values: an unfortunate intermingling. In the modern world, young people know that the pursuit of the “American Dream,” freedom through financial independence, is a hollow fantasy and not worth devoting one’s life to.
The solution lies in giving students belief in their plans and dreams: to live in the world of imagination. The job of educators and the public is to build a community of young people who maintain a conviction in themselves. This can be done one person at a time.
They must be instilled with the beliefs, “My life is precious and unique,” “I have something to offer the world,” “I do not want to be wage slave.”
This can be achieved, as Mahatma Gandhi showed us in his 1930 Salt March. We can begin humbly and yet accomplish great things. In this way, we will create a new system of thinking and a novel way of living.
Leon E. La Couvee
Taipei
Never ready for unification
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said “Taiwan is not ready” to discuss unification. Could there be any more telling a testament to his utter misunderstanding of the nature of Taiwan and its people? Is it any surprise that he sounds like a Chinese unification minister ruefully noting how damn long it is taking for Taiwan to just surrender to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)?
Just how does a democratic nation with a vibrant culture and economy, excellent quality of life and free society prepare to surrender it all to a totalitarian dictatorship with re-education camps and no freedom?
How does a free nation of people with their own language, history, culture, food and beliefs prepare to give it all up to one of the world’s most brutal regimes?
How does a country that meets all of the definitions of a nation, fighting for recognition and independence from tyranny and oppression, condemn its children, grandchildren and posterity to lives of sadness and death, recrimination, purges and cultural genocide at the hands of the CCP, one of the world’s most vicious political parties?
How does one willingly give up freedom for tyranny, free thought for brainwashing, religious freedom for religion with Chinese characteristics, ie, no religious freedom?
How does anyone give up a government by its express constitutional definition “of the people, by the people and for the people” for a dictatorship run by a single party bereft of democratic principles, freedom, human rights, justice, tolerance and dignity?
Those hallowed words of government derived from a speech given by former US president Abraham Lincoln almost 152 years ago at Gettysburg in 1863 came to the attention of a young Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙).
I am reminded of Lincoln’s words during the terrible US Civil War, which was fought to preserve the great concept of government, written to a mother who had lost five sons in the war: “I cannot refrain from tendering to you the consolation that may be found in the thanks of the Republic they died to save. I pray that our Heavenly Father may assuage the anguish of your bereavement, and leave you only the cherished memory of the loved and lost, and the solemn pride that must be yours to have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom.”
How very different the mindsets of the two presidents: Ma and Lincoln. Both faced with adversity, one brave to move heaven and Earth to preserve the people’s form of government, the other so morose that he could not achieve a complete surrender to tyranny during his eight-year tenure. There are in history the Lincolns and Churchills, and then there are the Philippe Petains and the Mas.
Nobody should or can be forced to march backward.
Ma, when he said, almost with disappointment, that Taiwan is not ready to discuss unification, showed his weakness and utter misunderstanding of Taiwanese and the freedoms they enjoy, despite his and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to eradicate them.
Taiwan will never be ready to join totalitarianism, and the KMT cannot be trusted to protect Taiwanese, and their hard won freedoms and way of life.
Lee Longhwa
Los Angeles
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and