The current presidential election campaign is different from previous campaigns.
Normally, the candidates make sure they stick to their respective parties’ stances to consolidate support from the party base. That done, they focus on soliciting the support of the biggest voter group, the “median voters,” who sit in the middle of the political spectrum.
However, this year, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is the only one following this strategy. The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) and the People First Party’s (PFP) James Soong (宋楚瑜) are still battling for the pan-blue camp’s voters and still have not started addressing undecided voters.
The pan-blue camp’s prospects are looking dim this time around, to the point where pan-blue candidates have to struggle to maintain their core voter support. Soong, who is entering the fray for the fourth time, is busy visiting old friends to build local support. In the 2000 election, Soong received 4.66 million votes, a number that has dropped in every consecutive election he has contested after that, but although pundits can only speculate how many votes he will win this time around, his candidacy worries both Hung and the KMT. The KMT is tasking its heavyweights with hitting the campaign trail while also mobilizing the Central Standing Committee and the state apparatus to guarantee at least 2.92 million votes, the number former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) received in the 2000 election. If the party does not even garner the 23 percent of the vote Lien received then, the question is how many legislative seats it will be able to keep.
The DPP’s goal is to win an absolute majority both in the presidential and the legislative elections, leaving the KMT and the PFP to fight with the smaller parties for the remaining seats. A fight between the KMT and the PFP could well turn ugly and turn voters to a third party, of which there are many: the Republic Party, the Social Welfare Party, the Non-Partisan Solidarity Union, the Social Democratic Party and the New Power Party.
The KMT and the PFP are both afraid of coming third in the polls because that could result in voters abandoning the smaller party to vote for the bigger, and they are therefore courting traditional pan-blue supporters instead of turning to median voters. While members of the KMT’s Central Standing Committee complain that Hung is not campaigning in central and southern Taiwan, Tsai is turning toward Hakka and Aboriginal communities, traditionally strong sources of pan-blue support.
As defeat in the presidential election seems all but certain, the KMT and the PFP are naturally focusing on the legislative elections. The PFP currently has a limited number of seats, and its candidates are relying on Soong’s candidacy to create enough momentum to bring in a few more at-large seats. As for the KMT, its incumbent legislators still enjoy local support, but the weakness of the party’s presidential candidate means that they are all on their own: While they may want the support of the party’s presidential candidate, they never know if Hung might say something to scare off potential voters if she were to show up at one of their rallies. Small wonder, then, that there is constant murmuring that Hung might be replaced.
Hung is single-mindedly focused on the presidential election and all but ignores the legislative elections, while Soong is focused on the legislative elections while showing little interest in the presidential contest. Still, the two elections are connected: When someone votes for a legislative candidate from a small party, which presidential candidate will they vote for? If pan-blue supporters vote for Hung or Soong simply because they feel they have to, not because they want to, will they consider changing how they vote in the legislative elections?
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry