There is growing recognition that the success of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) — that are to be adopted tomorrow at a special UN summit — are likely to depend on the ability of governments, businesses and civil society to harness data for decisionmaking. The key is to invest in building innovative data systems that draw on new sources of real-time data for sustainable development.
We live in a data-driven world. Advertisers, insurance companies, national security agencies and political advisers have already learned to tap into big data, sometimes to our chagrin; so, too, have countless scientists and researchers, thereby accelerating progress on new discoveries, but the global development community has been slower to benefit — not least because too much development data are still being collected using cumbersome approaches that lag behind today’s technological capabilities.
One way to improve data collection and use for sustainable development is to create an active link between the provision of services and the collection and processing of data for decisionmaking.
Illustration: Mountain People
Take healthcare services. Every day, in remote villages of developing countries, community health workers help patients fight diseases (such as malaria), get to clinics for checkups, receive vital immunizations, obtain diagnoses (through telemedicine) and access emergency aid for their infants and young children (such as for chronic malnutrition), but the information from such visits is usually not collected and even if it is put on paper, it is never used again.
We now have a much smarter way to proceed. Community health workers are increasingly supported by smartphone applications, which they can use to log patient information at each visit. That information can go directly onto public-health dashboards, which health managers can use to spot disease outbreaks, failures in supply chains or the need to bolster technical staff. Such systems can provide a real-time log of vital events, including births and deaths, and even use so-called verbal autopsies to help identify causes of death. And, as part of electronic medical records, the information can be used at future visits to the doctor or to remind patients of the need for follow-up visits or medical interventions.
Education provides the same kind of vast opportunity. Currently, school enrollment rates tend to be calculated based on student registrations at the beginning of the school year, even though actual attendance might be far below the registration rate. Moreover, officials wishing to report higher enrollment rates sometimes manipulate registration data, so we never get an accurate picture of who is actually at school.
With mobile apps, schools and community education workers can log student and teacher attendance on a transparent, real-time basis and follow up more easily with students who drop out, especially for reasons that could be overcome through informed intervention by community education workers. This information can be fed automatically into dashboards that education administrators can use to track progress in key areas.
Such data collection can accelerate sustainable development by improving decisionmaking, but that is only the first step. The same techniques should also be used to collect some of the key indicators that measure progress on the SDGs.
Measuring progress at frequent intervals and publicizing the successes and shortfalls is vital to keeping the world on track to meet its ambitious long-term targets. Doing so would not only enable us to reward governments that are fostering progress; it would also keep laggard governments accountable for their weak performance and, one hopes, motivate them to redouble their efforts.
The need for such real-time measurement became apparent over the past 15 years, when the world was pursuing the Millennium Development Goals.
Given that many key indicators are not yet collected in real time, but only through laborious retrospective household surveys, the indicators for the key poverty-reduction goal are as much as five years out of date for many countries. The world is aiming for targets this year for poverty, health and education, with, in some cases, key data only up to 2010.
Fortunately, the information and communications technology revolution and the spread of broadband coverage nearly everywhere can quickly make such time lags a thing of the past. As indicated in the report A World that Counts: Mobilizing the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development, we must modernize the practices used by statistical offices and other public agencies, while tapping into new sources of data in a thoughtful and creative way that complements traditional approaches.
Through more effective use of smart data — collected during service delivery, economic transactions and remote sensing — the fight against extreme poverty would be bolstered; the global energy system could be made much more efficient and less polluting; and vital services such as health and education could be made far more effective and accessible.
With this breakthrough in sight, several governments — including that of the US — as well as businesses and other partners, have announced plans to launch a new “Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data” at the UN this month. The new partnership aims to strengthen data collection and monitoring efforts by raising more funds, encouraging knowledge-sharing, addressing key barriers to access and use of data and identifying new big-data strategies to upgrade the world’s statistical systems.
The UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network is to support the new Global Partnership by creating a new Thematic Network on Data for Sustainable Development, which would bring together leading data scientists, thinkers and academics from across multiple sectors and disciplines to form a center of data excellence.
We are delighted to be chairing this network, which has at its core a commitment to turn facts and figures into real development progress. We firmly believe the data revolution can be a revolution for sustainable development, and we welcome partners from around the world to join us.
Jeffrey Sachs is a professor of sustainable development and of health policy and management, and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. Enrico Giovannini is a professor at University of Rome Tor Vergata. Robert Chen is director of the Center for International Earth Science Information Network. Shaida Badiee is managing director and cofounder of Open Data Watch.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry