Taiwan’s democratization is the result of a long-term struggle and social movements. All sorts of democratic developments — be they elections, removal of the ban on political parties and newspapers, the re-election of the National Assembly and direct presidential elections — were all fought for by the public.
The democratic achievements that Taiwan enjoys today were possible only because countless people in previous generations brought protests to the streets, shed sweat and even blood. The momentum of democracy was completely driven by the public; not one bit came about through the magnanimity of the party-state and the dictatorship.
During the Martial Law era, any form of protest or social movement was met with the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) accusations of their being communist spy activities, propaganda for Taiwanese independence, conspiracies, subversion or anything considered a threat to national security. Those who took part in such movements or protests were deemed, without exception, to be insurgents threatening social stability.
Even after martial law was lifted, when a group of academics, led by former Academia Sinica member Lee Chen-yuan (李鎮源), formed the Action 100 Alliance to promote the annulment of Article 100 of the Criminal Code through peaceful and nonviolent protests on the street, they were depicted in the media as rioters.
However, the growth of the Internet and transparency of information has made it difficult for some media outlets to interpret facts as they see fit. The use of the term “riots” has become less credible. So a new word was selected to replace the old terminology — populists.
The pan-blue media and politicians no longer seem able to make a comment without using this word. What they want to imply is that the public is a group of rioters who lack the ability to debate, who make decisions and blindly follow others based on emotional impulses instead of calm cool reasoning. They attribute all of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) failures to the new scapegoat, the populists.
Although their use of terminology to counteract social movements has improved with time, what remains is the KMT elite’s mentality of superiority and entitlement. As for the real causes of the problems in this nation, they usually just stick their heads into the sand like ostriches.
However, by reviewing the past some interesting occurrences can be seen. After the pan-blue camp lost the 2000 presidential election, groups of people illegally gathered and surrounded the KMT’s headquarters and the presidential residence. In 2004, despite the coalition between former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), the pan-blue camp lost the presidential race again, after which pan-blue supporters illegally protested on Ketagalan Boulevard for 21 days, even burning cars, throwing stones, attacking the police, hitting civilians, throwing Molotov cocktails and the like. If that was not populism, or rioting, I do not know what is.
In 2006, before former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was even put on trial and found guilty of corruption, a group of people in red shirts illegally rallied on Ketagalan Boulevard and at Taipei Railway Station to try to pressure the judicial system through extra-legal means. If this was not populism, what is?
The terminology has gone from “rioters” to “populists,” but it seems the real problem that Taiwan’s democracy suffers from is the KMT’s habitual use of language to stigmatize those who disagree with it.
Steve Wang is an assistant professor in the Institute of European Studies at Nanhua University.
Translated by Ethan Zhan
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under