What an extraordinary week. After years of poor displaced people always being “migrants” and never “refugees,” of the UK’s elected representatives calling them “swarms” and our professional trolls calling them “cockroaches,” only a few months after 4 million voted for a party whose only real principle is “never let them in,” a sudden geyser of compassion has erupted.
People making runs to Calais, France, are swamped with donations. People who set up fundraising pages are exceeding their targets 10 times over. And it is coming from all sectors of society: A mate whose house is serving as the local drop-off center is having his bell rung at all hours by middle-class parents, builders’ merchants, mechanics and even homeless people. It is brilliant, baffling and profoundly important.
It is far too early to call this a turning point, but the compassion explosion is compelling because it goes against all the dominant themes of modern politics. It stands in stark contrast to the Iraq war, probably the single most depoliticizing event of the 21st century, when 2 million people learned that it does not matter what you do, your government will ignore you anyway. This is the diametric opposite: Popular pressure has forced British Prime Minister David Cameron’s bitter and vindictive outfit to climb down and admit 20,000 people — a pitiful number compared with Germany’s 800,000 and not a single one from the survivors of the traumatic journey to Europe, but 20,000 more than they wanted to let in. If we keep pressing, that can be just the start. The key to it has been shaming our leaders through our own actions, not waiting for them to do the right thing, but showing them how to.
Iillustration: Mountain People
That return of agency, of individual and collective power to act, is a notable corrective to the second dominant theme of 21st-century politics: the insistence that we must comply with whatever markets dictate, that we are basically powerless to change the way we live. It is that sense of “what can we do?” that holds us back from even trying to make the world a better place.
However, when we do act, in whatever small way, the sense of joy and fulfillment that comes from connecting with others and making a difference gives us a whole new sense of who we are and what we are capable of.
Most of all, action connects us to other human beings, an ever more critical need as we live more and more of our lives virtually and online. When we drive a van full of supplies to Calais, or volunteer in a refugee center, or open our homes to exhausted families for a few days, we meet these strange and alien creatures we have been repeatedly taught to fear — and we find that they are funny, or interesting, or annoying, or all those things at once. In other words, that they are just like us. We expand our sense of who we are and of who other people are, and that is brilliant for both sides.
Overcoming the fear of others that has been drummed into us is probably the most radical thing we can do right now. Even more than contemptuous government or market dictatorship, post-Sept. 11, 2001, politics has been based on fear. Our elites cleverly manipulate the insecurity caused by their own capitalism, its ripping away of our safety nets and its destabilizing of our jobs and turn it into a fear of boundless terror attacks and hordes of grasping dusky migrants.
However, that fear can only be sustained by distance, by keeping people at arm’s length. Once you meet your fears, share a room or a cup of tea with them, they melt away.
Where will it go, the compassion explosion? Will it melt away as the photo of Alan Kurdi fades in our memories? It is completely possible, of course.
However, my bet is that the genie is out of the bottle. My bet is that as people rediscover the intoxicating sensation of actually being able to do something in real life instead of whining about it on the Internet, they will want more of it. (Some of them will take real-life action against migrants, not for them — let us not be fooled by our Facebook pages; not everyone feels compassion right now. But that is what makes democracy interesting.) And my bet is that as we realize that this refugee “crisis” is no crisis, but the new normal, we will start to think about what is causing people to move across the Earth in such huge numbers.
That is the next phase: to look at the causes of migration. Climate change. Western military intervention. The depredations of development banks and corporations. Propping up dodgy dictators in the name of stability. These are harder to fix than delivering bedrolls, but the key to it is to realize that Western elites are intimately responsible for all of them, using our money, and thus if anyone can do something, we can.
Even now Cameron is planning to use the suffering of Syrians to justify bombing Syria and killing more Alan Kurdis. If we do not connect the dots and begin to stop our elites doing the things that cause migration, we betray the millions of people who are not refugees yet, but assuredly will be.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry