Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), a member of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), has been playing games. Wang invited Democratic Progressive Party Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to attend next month’s Double Ten National Day celebrations.
KMT politicians — the self-styled “rightful heirs to the Chinese throne” — were probably feeling rather pleased with themselves, having put “Little Tsai” on the spot, but they failed to foresee the shifting sands of Taiwanese politics. Tsai enthusiastically accepted the invitation and in doing so, dramatically exposed the hypocrisy of the hawkish KMT mob.
At the time of the Chinese Wuchang Uprising and the subsequent Xinhai Revolution in 1911, Taiwan did not belong to the Qing Dynasty, nor did it belong to the Qing Dynasty’s successor, the Republic of China (ROC).
Double Ten National Day celebrations were brought to Taiwan by the KMT after they lost the Chinese Civil War and were exiled. The KMT used textbooks and propaganda to force Taiwanese to accept the new national day, something that the public never really took to.
Society moves with the times. The power of those who once relied on the outdated construct of the Double Ten National Day and the ROC national flag for survival is already declining, while old slogans such as “retake the mainland” and “legitimate rulers of China” are now openly mocked.
In 1971, Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) representatives were expelled from the UN and the People’s Republic of China was recognized as the official government of China.
The remnants of the KMT, still stuck in the mind-set of the Chinese Civil War, clung for dear life to the model of a so-called “one China” and maintained that they are its rightful rulers.
However, the young generation, who has stepped out into the world and faced Beijing’s suppression, has recognized that Taiwan and China are two separate countries. As for Double Ten National Day and the ROC flag, they take the pragmatic view that these are simply symbolic representations of their nation.
When abroad, people from the young generation need a national symbol to show where they come from and give them a feeling of pride. On the other hand, older people are strongly conscious of their Taiwanese identity and resent a national day and flag that were introduced from abroad.
However, the new practical definition of these two symbols of national identity has managed to break through the subtle distinctions of separate Taiwanese and Chinese national days and national flags. On either side of the Taiwan Strait, the national days, national flags, constitutions, governments, passports, people and territories are all different. If this is not the definition of two separate nations, then what is?
The KMT has harshly confiscated Taiwan’s national flag at the most crucial moments — during ceremonies to welcome Chinese officials visiting the nation.
During the administration of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), they refused to take part in Double Ten National Day celebrations or, alternatively, created disturbance during the commemorations.
They could not have predicted that Tsai would seize the ball from the KMT’s court. Tsai has caused panic within the KMT and Wang will surely think before attempting to play tricks and ambush his opponent again.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Edward Jones
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
On Jan. 13, Taiwan, backed by democratic individuals, groups and countries worldwide, succeeded to uphold democracy in the face of formidable challenges and threats posed by the semi-powerful communism and authoritarianism of the People’s Republic of China. It is time for Taiwan and president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to reciprocate. Taiwan is uniquely positioned to work with Afghan democrats and democracies worldwide, which could pave the way for democracy’s resurgence in Afghanistan. Taiwan has always stirred feelings of curiosity and admiration among Afghans. They are majorly sympathetic toward Taiwan’s cause of freedom, independence and democracy. Afghans also share Taiwan’s resilience, yet