Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) frequently uses the word “populist” in her Facebook posts, with phrases such as “populist rule,” “populist bullying” and “Taiwan’s politics are increasingly populist.”
So, what exactly is populism? Wikipedia is clear about the term’s ambiguity.
“The term populism is one of the least precisely defined terms used in social sciences,” the Chinese-language Wikipedia Web site says, adding that populism is usually the opposite of elitism, that supporters of populism appeal for direct and grassroots democracy, that it opposes the elite and is contrary to their opinions, and is seen by elitists as synonymous with provoking ethnic conflict for political interests.
It seems that populism is pretty neutral. Then why is such a stigma attached to it and why is it equated with instigation or mob violence?
Populism is really just a phenomenon, but, just as the sea can float a boat or capsize it, a phenomenon can be used for reform or for disaster and destruction.
Adolf Hitler’s Nazism in Germany, China’s Cultural Revolution, Tunisia’s Jasmine Revolution, Taiwan’s Sunflower movement and Hong Kong’s Umbrella revolution were all populist by nature, and they all brought both reform and disaster.
Hung’s use of the word “populist” is contemptuous and angry, akin to blame. Her use of the word confirms that she is among the elite and holds views contrary to public opinion.
The elitist Hung is able to use populism to provoke ethnic conflict for political gain, and the Hung who operates that elitist persona is a superb puppet master, which is both paradoxical and ironic.
Taiwan is a nation of immigrants and an ethnic melting pot. There were people who immigrated here before the Chinese and there will be those who come after.
The Qing Emperor Yongzheng (雍正) wrote: “Since ancient times Taiwan has not belonged to China. As emperor, I considered extending into the territory” — referring to the Qing court formally annexing the island in April 1684. There is evidence of ancient cultures all around Taiwan. Artifacts have been unearthed from the Changpin (昌平) culture in Taitung, dating from around 15,000 to 50,000 years ago. The mere 300 years of Chinese culture pales in significance compared with them.
Today, despite being born and raised in Taiwan, Hung and her ilk remain unwilling to integrate and accept Taiwan as their motherland; instead they try to force Taiwanese to consider China their motherland. Hung, et al., do not want Taiwanese to have any view of history other than China’s version. This is exactly the type of populism that provokes ethnic conflict for political gain.
As for Oct. 10: Hung’s party’s jubilant celebrations when they were in power compared with the clamorous demonstrations when they were in opposition present prime examples of populist bullying.
Talking about Taiwan and fawning over Japan and China can all be considered instigating ethnic conflict for political gain. Fawning over Japan is not labeled as populist, while fawning over China is sugar-coated as being “one family across the Taiwan Strait.”
Similarly, Hung, et al., condemned the Sunflower movement for being a populist act. However, former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) raising invalid complaints over the 2004 presidential election results and the “red shirt” movement forcing former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to resign were not considered populist actions, but simply a demand for truth and a blow against corruption.
What’s good for the goose...
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Clare Lear
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry