The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is teetering. Soon, it could well lose power, and the whole edifice might come tumbling down.
The privileged few in the higher echelons are guilty of not listening to the public. In an attempt to rally his troops, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), whose approval rating stands at about 9 percent, spoke about the KMT’s “victory over the Japanese in the Second Sino-Japanese War and Taiwan’s retrocession,” while forgetting to express his gratitude to Taiwanese for giving the exiled Republic of China (ROC) party-state a place to stay.
Next, he targeted former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), who had spoken of his own experience of recent history, trying to force Lee to talk of the Taiwanese experience of “the war against Japanese aggression” and promoting the KMT party-state through feelings of enmity toward Tokyo.
Public imagination is often muddied by the manipulations of ignorant and ill-meaning regimes. However, in the end, history usually takes care of itself.
When Lee left office and the Democratic Progressive Party took power, he was at pains to emphasize that Taiwanese and those who came over from China after World War II would have their own experiences and memories of historical reality.
He spoke about the different factors behind people living together in the nation trying to formulate some kind of common destiny, and of the importance of mutual understanding. Lee, despite having been president and KMT chairman, was no darling of the fundamentalist faction within the colonialist, Chinese-style party-state. In fact, his brand of localization was its antidote. Having exorcised itself of him, the party essentially denied itself the possibility of its continued localization or regeneration, consigning itself to the gradual process of digging its own grave.
What Taiwanese are now afraid of is what tattered legacy the party-state might leave behind, and if it will be possible to tear it down.
The vast majority of Taiwanese never chose to become Japanese subjects. They became so because Taiwan was ceded to a victorious Japan by a defeated Qing Dynasty. During World War II, Taiwanese fought on Japan’s behalf. Why was it that Taiwanese went from welcoming their “motherland” to hating China?
The ROC, assuming control of Taiwan on behalf of the Allies after Japan left at the end of the war, occupied Taiwan and took it as a colony, suppressing the populace and, within two years, instigated the 228 Incident, a massacre by any other name. Then-governor Chen Yi (陳儀), sent from China by then-president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), had previously visited Taipei in the 1930s to attend the World Expo as the ROC representative. He was a ROC VIP full of praise for what Japan had done to its Taiwan colony.
After 1949, the ROC on Taiwan was but the remnants of that China. It ruled by breaking the local populace, through the White Terror era and the long years of martial law, for which it should seek atonement not just from Taiwanese but also from the people who followed them from China, many of whom have tried to start a new life for themselves, identifying as Taiwanese.
The nation needs to be reborn: an act of saving itself. The ROC system, melded with the idea of China, is a historical dead end, a wasteful project of vying with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) on “the mainland.”
No matter how much Ma continues to talk of the “war of resistance against Japanese aggression,” it is still part of the history of the PRC, which took over from the ROC. Why is it that Taiwanese, after being ceded to Japan, went from resisting the Japanese to being pro-Japanese, the exact opposite of how they reacted to their Chinese masters?
Of course, Taiwan does not belong to Japan, but then neither does it belong to China. Taiwan belongs to the people who live here; the property of neither the KMT nor the Chinese Communist Party.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China