Breaking with their usual practice when it comes to train wrecks and other disasters of human origin, there has been little evidence of China’s leaders this week in the wake of the latest “Black Monday,” the worst day for Chinese shares since 2007. Actually, there has been little sign of them since the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) suddenly devalued the yuan on Aug. 11, triggering the currency’s biggest one-day loss in two decades.
However, some standard operating procedures appear to have been followed this week: one, restrict mention of the problem in the local media; two, announce a probe into suspected illegal actions by low-level players; three, blame outsiders, especially Western governments, for creating the problem in the first place or hyping it up; four, cry victim; five, praise the leadership for its acumen and bravery and, six, above all else, never let facts interfere with announced policies.
As usual, any problem, big or small, cannot be seen to be the fault of the Chinese Communist Party, because that might lead to criticism of the party, its leadership and the nation’s political structure. The party’s Teflon coating, while flaking fast, means that scapegoats must be found elsewhere.
Chinese shares have been in trouble since early June, and the Shanghai bourse’s main index has fallen more than 40 percent since then. The move to accuse some local securities firms of manipulating prices — as occurred on Wednesday — was followed by a one-two punch on Thursday of Chinese media commentaries lambasting their foreign counterparts for being doomsayers and fanning fears of a crisis and a top PBOC official telling Reuters that this week’s roiling of Chinese and global stock markets was not down to China’s exchange rate reform, but fears about the US Federal Reserve raising interest rates.
“We were wronged,” PBOC Research Institute of Finance and Banking Director-General Yao Yudong (姚余棟) said.
However, there is plenty of evidence available that the government, the PBOC and other officials were more than happy to act as cheerleaders when the Chinese stock market turned bullish earlier this year, and they sought to encourage Chinese to invest and to consume more to boost the national economy. So obviously someone erred, somewhere.
However, the lack of independent and transparent regulatory authorities and an independent financial press in China has long been a burden on the economy in terms of investment by both locals and foreigners and has also handicapped Chinese corporations seeking to become global players.
In addition, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vaunted anti-corruption crackdown, in addition to its political score-settling side, has actually made it more difficult to learn about Chinese corporations, as will the national security law passed by the National People’s Congress early last month and the cybersecurity law that is still in the draft stage.
Many analysts believe the Chinese government will attempt to prop up the markets in the coming days, to prevent the economic turmoil from overshadowing next week’s commemorative efforts marking the end of World War II, especially the massive military parade scheduled for Thursday in Beijing.
What happens after that is anyone’s guess.
However, this week, if not the entire month, has been a reminder that Chinese politics and economics operate on a very different playing field from the rest of the world and we should forget that at our peril.
This is a lesson that many in Taiwan have for too long been willing to ignore, be it the corporate titans’ rush to tap the China market for cheap labor, land and less restrictive environmental laws or President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) brethren eager to boost ties with Beijing.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry