India worth the risk
This letter is in response to Tsering Namgyal’s article (“Taiwan tech sector ready for India foray,” Aug. 14, page 8).
It might have been worth noting that Chinese companies are more interested in moving into India than Taiwanese companies. Just think about Huawei and Xiami, both of which are moving in fast. China’s railway companies are all set to go and construct big networks in India — if India will only let them.
In fact, Chinese companies would probably move in faster if it were not for the Indian authorities who are putting obstacles in the way of Chinese companies in the name of “security.” Taiwan should be able to benefit from this, but Taiwanese, like most “island” people, are risk averse.
I do not think mass manufacturing will shift in a large way out of China. The supply chain is already in China and the margins are already thin, so it will stay in China and slowly die. The next phase of manufacturing, with embedded software and robots, will move to India. That is the future and margins are better.
So India will not “beat” China — it will just play a different game.
Taiwan’s perceptions and actions are understandable to some degree. Most of East Asia, including even poorer countries such as Vietnam, are better linked than India is with East Asia. And we are not talking about flights either.
When I told an intelligent and well-connected lady in Taiwan’s fund industry that India is no more difficult a place to do business than China, she replied: “Well at least we eat the same food.”
Such reactions are not to be dismissed lightly, but ultimately it is true that those who seek comfort will fail and those who take risks, in food as in other things, will succeed.
South Korea took the risk with India long ago and is reaping the dividends. Japan has only moved in recently. Neither country finds India or Indians “easy,” but they have made their moves. Have no doubt, Taiwan will, in its own way, move to India in a big way.
N. Balakrishnan
Hong Kong
Soong a political actor
People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) is a political actor in many aspects.
Soong asked his supporters to put mud on his face and white shirt, and jokingly said that if they were in the White Terror era, they would be shot to death.
His mud show was in bad taste, treating Taiwan’s tragedy as a joke, and public complaints as mud. Soong forgets that he was an official in a bad government.
In response to a criticism of Soong’s banning the speaking of Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) and Hakka while he was head of the Government Information Office, he said that he did not invent the policy so he was not responsible. Using his logic, murderers using poison gases, guns or knives would not be guilty since they did not invent these weapons.
On Dec. 10, 1979, many Taiwanese staged a peaceful demonstration in Kaohsiung for democracy and freedom while under the one-party dictatorship of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Soong labeled them as “violent and rebellious people.”
One of them was sentenced to life in prison and several others received jail terms of between 12 and 14 years.
On a recent political talk show, Soong spoke a few phrases of Taiwanese, Hakka and two Aboriginal languages when defending the dialect-banning policy. Soong used the simple phrases to show he is not against dialects now that he is trying to gain votes.
Soong likes to cry in public, especially when he talks about his deceased wife, a Taiwanese. His crying demonstrates his love for his wife and, more importantly, his status as a Taiwanese son-in-law.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) inadvertently gave Soong an opportunity to run for president again. Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) consulted Soong for advice in municipal administration, and political commentator Hu Chung-hsin (胡忠信) recommended Soong to be a premier.
Soong was popular as Taiwan provincial governor because he used the money tactic of “giving a dollar even if asked to give 50 cents.” He was generous in spending taxpayers’ money.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.