People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) has thrown his hat into the ring for next year’s presidential race. He brings some differentiating characteristics into the mix.
He is the only male, for example, and the only candidate who was born in China. He is also the oldest among the candidates thus far; he has contested the most elections; he has the muddiest face of the lot, judging from his official election poster; and his announcement declaring his intention to stand was the most long-winded. Essentially, however, his decision to stand is little more than a continuation of infighting within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The internal tensions within the KMT revolve around identification with the “orthodox” and the various “offshoots” thereof. Former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) rid himself of his political enemies by setting himself up as chief disciple of Republic of China (ROC) founding father Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) and branding everyone else traitors to the cause; part of a renegade strain. Soong has sought to characterize himself as a political disciple of Sun and former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), Chiang Kai-shek’s son and successor.
This assertion, however, has been met with a certain amount of ridicule from within the KMT, the two sides accusing each other of diverging from the younger Chiang’s strain. Back in the day, the all-pervading climate was that of Chiang Ching-kuo’s authoritarian regime; the KMT had yet to encounter the democratizing offshoot of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) that was so popular among the public. That, or Lee’s offshoot was still considered to be a renegade strain within the party.
As chairman of the PFP, Soong is the leader of a minor party within the legislature. If he, against all expectations, is elected president, he would still not command an absolute majority and would have to enter into a grand coalition of parties that most suit his own interests. Coalition is not necessarily a good thing: It has been said that if power corrupts, absolute-majority rule corrupts absolutely, but this only applies to authoritarian parties such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or the KMT. It does not apply to Western democracies.
As far as national identification is concerned, Soong is no fool: He is not going to refuse to admit the existence of the ROC, but does admit that it exists within the false framework in which the KMT operates. By saying that “maintaining the ROC ‘status quo’ is the main consensus within Taiwan” he is not saying anything controversial, but his contention that cross-strait relations in their current form are an extension of the Chinese Civil War and that the dealings between the two sides are a struggle between the regimes of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the ROC, just does not tally with the facts, nor is it a position that the majority of Taiwanese would be prepared to accept.
The ROC the majority of Taiwanese recognize is not a regime vying with the PRC regime for control of China. It is, instead, a state and a government, the citizens and territory in its jurisdiction limited to those understood within the present “status quo.” Taiwan is not a part of China, neither is it owned by the KMT, and it is certainly not some kind of gambling chip between the CCP and the KMT. The only problem is that the PRC is insisting, against all reason, on taking Taiwan’s sovereignty.
Soong is offering nothing new. It will take more than him winning the presidential election for him to dispense with the KMT of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry