This week’s G7 meeting at Schloss Elmau in the Bavarian Alps marked a major breakthrough in climate change policy. The seven largest high-income economies — the US, Japan, Germany, the UK, France, Italy and Canada — made the revolutionary decision to decarbonize their economies over the course of this century.
For the first time in history, the world’s major economies have agreed on the need to end their dependence on fossil fuels. US President Barack Obama, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the other G7 leaders have risen to the occasion and deserve strong global approbation.
The historic breakthrough is recorded in the final G7 communique. First, the G7 countries underscored the importance of holding global warming to below 2°C. This means that the Earth’s average temperature should be kept within 2°C of the average temperature that prevailed before the start of the Industrial Revolution, roughly before 1800. Yet global warming to date is already around 0.9°C — nearly halfway to the upper limit.
Then, the G7 leaders did something unprecedented. They acknowledged that in order to hold global warming below the 2°C limit, the world’s economies must end their dependence on fossil fuels — coal, oil and natural gas.
Currently, about 80 percent of worldwide primary energy comes from fossil fuels, the combustion of which emits around 34 billion tons of carbon dioxide. This level of emissions, if continued in future decades, would push temperatures far above the 2°C upper limit. Indeed, with rising worldwide energy use, continued dependence on fossil fuels could raise global temperatures by 4°C to 6°C, leading to potentially catastrophic consequences for global food production, higher sea levels, mega-droughts, major floods, devastating heat waves and extreme storms.
The science is clearer than many politicians would like. For humanity to have a “likely” chance of staying below the 2°C threshold, a small reduction in carbon emissions is not enough. In fact, emissions have to fall to zero later this century to stop any further rise in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide. Simply put, the world economy must be “decarbonized.”
The breakthrough at the G7 summit was that the seven governments recognized this, declaring that the 2°C limit requires “decarbonization of the global economy over the course of this century.” The G7 finally stated clearly what scientists have been urging for years: Humanity must not merely reduce, but must end, carbon emissions from fossil fuels this century.
Decarbonization is feasible, though by no means easy. It depends on taking three key steps.
First, we must become more energy efficient, for example, through modern building designs that reduce the needs for heating, cooling, and energy-intensive ventilation. Second, we must produce electricity with wind, solar, nuclear, hydroelectric, geothermal, and other non-carbon energy sources, or by capturing and storing the carbon dioxide produced by fossil fuels — a process known as carbon capture and storage (CCS). Third, we must switch from fossil fuels to electricity or hydrogen produced by zero-carbon electricity, or in some cases, such as aviation, to advanced biofuels.
The hard part is the practical, large-scale implementation of broad concepts in a way that does not disrupt our energy dependent world economy and does not cost a fortune to achieve. However, as the costs are tallied, it should be noted that runaway climate change would impose the greatest costs of all.
To succeed, it is expected to take several decades to convert power stations, infrastructure and building stock to low-carbon technologies. The low-carbon technologies also need to be upgraded, whether it is PV solar cells, batteries for energy storage, CCS for safely storing carbon dioxide or nuclear power plants that win the public’s confidence. The G7, notably, committed to “developing and deploying innovative technologies striving for a transformation of the energy sectors by 2050” and invited “all countries to join us in this endeavor.”
This global process of decarbonization is expected to be long and complex, requiring detailed roadmaps with periodic redesigns as technologies evolve. The G7 also made a historic breakthrough by declaring its readiness to “develop long-term national low-carbon strategies” to get to a decarbonized future. The UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, which I direct on behalf of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, has been working on such low-carbon strategies for the main emitting countries in a project called the Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project.
Of course, the G7 declaration is only a declaration, and it does not yet include the commitments of many of the world’s largest carbon-emitting countries, including China, India and Russia. Yet it is a crucial step that could greatly encourage other countries to participate in decarbonization, especially in view of the G7’s commitment to speed the development of improved low-carbon technologies.
The outcome of the G7’s meeting augurs well for a strong global agreement on climate change when all 193 UN member states meet in Paris in December to hammer out a global climate agreement. The G7 countries have not yet ensured a successful outcome at the Paris meeting, but they have taken a big step toward that goal.
Jeffrey Sachs is a professor of sustainable development, professor of health policy and management and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University. He is also special adviser to the UN secretary-general on the Millennium Development Goals.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this