Common sense is often the first casualty of modern society’s love affair with technological innovation. Courtesy is often the second, while, unfortunately, public safety and lives are increasingly the third.
In a little more than three decades, we have seen this cycle repeated, with little variation, again and again — with governments struggling to keep abreast of the curve with safety standards and regulations.
As car phones became more affordable in the 1980s, the problem of people thinking they could drive while holding the handset in one hand became a concern — and the cause of accidents. The advent of cellphones and hands-free systems made it possible for drivers to keep both hands on the wheel while driving, but did little to eliminate the distraction factor, or halt the ever-increasing number of road fatalities.
As the 20th century became the 21st, text messaging became widespread and texting pedestrians, oblivious to the movement of people or vehicles around them, joined the ranks of stupid drivers who thought they could text and control a vehicle at the same time — be it a car, truck or bus. The ranks of the injured or dead grew correspondingly, regardless of the public safety campaigns or police crackdowns.
The downsizing of computer operating systems that took consumers from desktop PCs to laptops to personal digital assistants, notebooks, smartphones and tablets, just meant that there were more options to distract them, making rudeness and narcissism not only commonplace, but acceptable.
Now that drones have downsized in scale and price, they have turned into a public safety issue and regulatory headache because of the same lack of common sense on the part of operators and the lack of foresight by government regulators and lawmakers.
The Civil Aviation Act (民用航空法) bars flying objects, including drones, kites, sky lanterns and hot air balloons, from flying above 60m from the elevation of an airport in the area within 6km of the central line of the runway.
Nevertheless, the Taipei Financial Center Corp on Tuesday said its personnel had found three drones near the base of Taipei 101 since last month, including one that day, while on Wednesday, the Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA) fined a person whose drone was found last month at the end of the Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) runway.
Although the act stipulates that the owner of a drone may be fined between NT$300,000 and NT$1.5 million (US$9,515 and US$47,574) for breaking the law, both the owner of the drone that ended up on Songshan’s runway and the Chinese tourist whose drone hit Taipei 101 on Tuesday are likely to face the minimum fine as first-time offenders.
That is almost rewarding stupidity.
Drones pose a direct danger to airplanes and helicopters, and perhaps a more indirect danger to bystanders if they crash into a building or the ground. The recent years of experience of cellphone/smartphone use show that it is useless to rely on common sense or goodwill; a large number of people think that rules apply to everyone but themselves.
The CAA said that the government is considering tightening the regulations on the use of drones and a draft of the new rules could be ready by the middle of September. With the number of drones expected to grow exponentially in the coming years among hobbyists and corporate users, the government needs not only to act quickly, but to take a very tough line.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry