In 2000, when the world adopted the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), a promise was made: Education is a right and every child must be educated. This years Oslo Summit on Education for Development confirmed the growing consensus within the global education community about what must be done to honor that pledge.
Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg and Foreign Minister Borge Brende are to be congratulated. They not only helped to turbocharge the discussion, but also — and more importantly — helped to forge policymakers’ resolve to find the resources that are required to get the job done under the upcoming Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs, which are to succeed the MDGs).
Indeed, the first achievement of the Oslo summit was a call to get much more serious about closing the US$39 billion annual gap in external funding needed to ensure that every child attends pre-primary, primary and secondary school. This is the bedrock of the proposed SDG to “ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote life-long learning opportunities for all.”
At the meeting’s close, Norway announced the establishment of a Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunities. The new commission, convened by Norway, Indonesia, Chile and Malawi, and headed by former UK prime minister Gordon Brown, is to make the case for investment in education and reversal of the decline in overall funding. This gives education the same opportunity that the health sector had following the adoption of the MDGs.
At that time, the world secured the donor funding and introduced the innovating finance mechanisms that enabled widespread vaccine distribution and led to better ways to combat HIV, malaria and other diseases. Today, we need to unlock the same doors to ensure that governments, philanthropists, the private sector and others step up to meet the world’s education needs.
The Oslo meeting also advanced work that is already underway to establish a cohesive response to the education crisis afflicting tens of millions of children caught up in war, civil strife, epidemics and natural disasters. Children across Asia, the Middle East and Africa have been driven out of school — many for years — compounding their misery and jeopardizing their futures. The aim under the emerging approach is to have a new program that responds to these children’s needs ready to start next year.
The Oslo meeting also affirmed new horizons. No one spoke more eloquently than Pakistani schoolgirl and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Malala Yousufzai. Her appeal for 12 years of quality primary and secondary education for all children electrified the meeting’s participants. “If nine years of education is not enough for your children, then it is not enough for the rest of the world’s children,” she declared. “The world needs to think bigger and it needs to dream bigger.”
And so we shall. As world leaders head to Addis Ababa this week for the Third International Conference on Financing for Development, they are to be guided not only by what happened in Oslo, but also by other important recent markers of global sentiment. For example, education has been endorsed repeatedly as the highest development priority in UN My World Surveys. Likewise, in May, the Incheon Declaration of the World Education Forum endorsed quality education for all and called for the Global Partnership for Education (GPE) to be scaled up and strengthened.
The draft outcome document for the upcoming conference in Addis Ababa reflects the rapidly emerging consensus:
“We will scale up investments and international cooperation to allow all children to complete free, equitable, inclusive and quality early childhood, primary and secondary education, including through scaling up and strengthening initiatives, such as the Global Partnership for Education.”
So what needs to be done in Addis Ababa — and beyond — to take this agenda forward?
For starters, it is essential that advocacy efforts to ensure better resourcing of the current GPE model continue, accompanied by a strategy to attract new donor governments and new private-sector and philanthropic engagement. Moreover, there is a critical need to design innovative financing solutions that work at scale, as well as to ensure better donor coordination, while efforts within developing countries to create functioning taxation systems and transparent government accounting must be better coordinated with efforts to improve domestic resource mobilization.
Last but not least, it is essential to identify and agree on the best approach to meeting the educational needs of children in crisis and conflict.
As with the MDGs’ success in achieving its health targets, ensuring the capacity to meet the world’s educational needs requires exploring seed financing and then upscaling, after appropriate due diligence and new ways of working. Much can be done to create global goods platforms for educational inputs like books, technology, professional support materials for teachers and student learning assessment mechanisms. By bringing to bear the efficiencies that come with scale, such an approach promises to support country-led education planning and implementation.
The GPE’s members — 60 developing-country partners, donor countries, civil-society organizations, teachers associations, private-sector actors and others, including UN agencies — are all ready to realize the SDG vision. Those most committed to these goals know that this is the time, this is our fight, this is what we must do for our children throughout the world.
Julia Gillard, former Australian prime minister, is chair of the Global Partnership for Education.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s