The UN Climate Change Conference in Paris in December is likely to feature all the tightly choreographed production values of a Hollywood blockbuster.
The cast will be huge: presidents and prime ministers on center stage, supported by thousands of extras, including protesters, riot police and busloads of media. The script might still be under wraps, but the plot has already leaked: This time, in sharp contrast to the failed negotiations in Copenhagen in 2009, the planet is going to win.
It is a seductive plot, but one that does not quite hold together. Goodwill and hard bargaining, the world is to be told, paid off. Governments have agreed to voluntary reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that are to prevent the planet from heating more than 2°C. Then, in a stunning deus ex machina, it will be revealed that the world’s largest fossil-fuel companies — the so-called supermajors — have agreed to bring net emissions to zero by 2100, by capturing carbon at the source, sucking it out of the atmosphere and storing it underground. The planet will have been saved and the economy is to be free to flourish. Cue the music and roll the credits.
The trouble is that the script is fiction, not documentary. The technology required has yet to be invented and bringing net emissions to zero simply is not possible. And, like a Hollywood production, the Paris conference’s message is likely heavily influenced by those who have the most money.
The math is not difficult to follow. The world’s energy infrastructure — finely tooled for the use of fossil fuels — is worth US$55 trillion. The paper value of the fossil-fuel reserves — most of them owned by the supermajors — is about US$28 trillion.
The fossil-fuel industry’s influence is evident in the fact that governments worldwide are expected to spend some US$5.3 trillion this year subsidizing it, including the massive outlays necessary to counteract its adverse health and environmental effects.
In other words, the governments meeting in Paris spend more subsidizing the causes of climate change than they do on global healthcare or, for that matter, on climate change mitigation and adaptation.
However, that is not part of the story in Paris. There, the global public is to be presented with a narrative premised on two unproven forms of geoengineering, whose proponents seek to manipulate the planetary system. The effort that is likely to receive the greatest amount of attention is bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECSS).
In May, the US Department of Energy convened a private meeting to discuss this technology, which might be the fig leaf used by the supermajors to protect their assets.
However, deploying BECSS would require the world to maintain an area 1.5 times the size of India full of fields or forests capable of absorbing vast amounts of carbon dioxide, while still providing enough food for a global population that is expected to exceed 9 billion by 2050.
By then, the technology’s advocates promise, biological sequestration can be joined by programs that capture emissions as they are released or pull them out of the air to be pumped into deep subterranean shafts — out of sight and out of mind.
Fossil-fuel producers promote carbon capture to allow them to keep their mines open and pumps flowing. Unfortunately for the planet, many scientists consider it technically impossible and financially backbreaking — especially if such technology is to be deployed in time to avert chaotic climate change.
Preventing temperatures from rising out of control requires a second geoengineering fix, known as solar radiation management. The idea is to mimic the natural cooling action of a volcanic eruption by using techniques like the deployment of hoses to pump sulfates 30km into the stratosphere to block sunlight.
The UK’s Royal Society believes that the need for such technology might be unavoidable and it has been working with counterparts in other countries to explore ways in which its use should be governed.
Earlier this year, the US’ National Academies of Science gave the technique a tepid endorsement and the Chinese government announced a major investment in weather modification, which could include solar radiation management. Russia is already at work developing the technology.
Unlike carbon capture, obstructing sunlight actually has the potential to lower global temperatures. In theory, the technology is simple, cheap and capable of being deployed by a single country or a small group of collaborators; no UN consensus is required.
However, solar radiation management does not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. It only masks their effects. If the hoses shut down, the planet’s temperature is likely to soar.
The technology could buy time, but it surrenders control of the planetary thermostat to those who hold the hoses. Even the technology’s advocates concede that their computer models predict that it could have a strong negative impact on tropical and subtropical regions.
Climate change is bad, but geoengineering has the potential to make it worse.
The story that the Paris conference’s producers ask viewers to believe relies on technologies that are no more effective than smoke and mirrors. It is important that the public learns to see past them.
The curtain rises on a set of false promises and it closes with policies that can lead only to mayhem — unless the audience gets into the act.
Neth Dano is Asia director at the ETC Group. Pat Mooney is executive director at the ETC Group.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.