This year marks the 120th anniversary of the Treaty of Shimonoseki signed between China’s Qing Empire and Japan, and also the 70th anniversary of the end of World War II. Both these events affected Taiwan’s destiny. For most of the post-war period, Taiwan has been ruled by the Republic of China (ROC) after its expulsion by the People’s Republic of China (PRC). This has created a complex political situation.
After former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) took over as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman, the KMT started to work with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) against Taiwan, and since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came to power in 2008, he has gradually yielded the nation’s sovereignty to China.
However, the Sunflower movement and the nine-in-one elections last year changed the situation significantly. Although Ma still holds administrative and judicial power, and although the KMT keeps stirring up trouble, it cannot be denied that both domestically and internationally the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is more favorable than ever before.
China’s military expansion and the US’ “rebalancing to Asia” policy have again highlighted the importance of Taiwan’s strategic position. As Taiwan-US relations grow closer, Ma’s pro-China policy is encountering difficulties, which is boosting Taiwan’s political, economic and military autonomy.
China is increasingly isolated diplomatically, and the CCP is engulfed in its severest power struggle of the past 26 years, with no sign of improvement. The Chinese economy is slowing and its stock market could crash at any time. These factors affect China’s Taiwan policy. Beijing has been frustrated by Hong Kong, so it dares not adopt a more aggressive Taiwan policy. Beijing has no choice but to face the DPP.
The KMT is also caught in a power struggle. The KMT’s “mainstream” force led by Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) is turning the party into another version of the deep-blue New Party, which could cause a split. The DPP won the most cities and counties ever in the nine-in-one elections, meaning independent Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is unlikely to go against the party, and the integration of a “third force” is faltering. This is advantageous for the DPP in the lead-up to next year’s elections.
The government’s “minor adjustments” to high school curriculum guidelines led to senior-high school student protests and the younger generation now sees the KMT as its enemy, while support for the DPP’s ideals is growing.
Given these circumstances, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) chances of winning the presidential election have increased significantly, and the party might win a legislative majority. However, things change and the party should be cautious in its handling of relations with the third force, including the People First Party.
The DPP is shouldering a greater responsibility. As the end of the Ma era approaches, a number of cases of corruption and negligence might be exposed. The DPP should resolve those problems immediately if it wins the election to save Taiwan from deteriorating.
The DPP should offer better policies and visions, and improve its crisis management abilities. The Formosa Fun Coast (八仙海岸) fire has exposed the insufficiency of medical facilities. This problem is crucial to public health and welfare. Concerning the construction of the Taipei Dome and the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City, the DPP should propose or consolidate its policy suggestions.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under