Legal disputes to ensue
The National Health and Insurance Administration of the Ministry of Health and Welfare made a series of announcements, including “The instruction for medical expenses caused by the Formosa Fun Coast park cornstarch fire accident in New Taipei City” and “Matters about medical expenses within three months after the Formosa Fun Coast park cornstarch fire accident in New Taipei City,” to explain how funding for medical expenses related to injuries sustained at the Formosa Fun Coast blast would be distributed.
According to the announcements, the ministry will exercise the right of subrogation against Taian Insurance (泰安產物保險公司), insurer of the Formosa Fun Coast water park (八仙海岸), and those who are held responsible for the event at which the fire occurred. However, the report clarifying who is responsible for the accident has not been clear.
According to Article 95 of the National Health Insurance Act (全民健康保險法): “In case the third party is liable for the beneficiary due to tortuous accident covered by this insurance, the insurer of this insurances may, after paying the medical benefits to the beneficiary, exercise the right of subrogation against the tort-feasors specifically addressed by the following subparagraphs: In public safety accidents: The insurer of compulsory third party liability.”
The ministry may exercise the right of subrogation against the park’s insurer, Taian Insurance. But after its acceptance of the New Taipei City government categorical funding, should this right of subrogation claims be transferred to New Taipei City?
Moreover, what is the scope of its claim against the insurer? The cost of its payments, or the insured amount of liability insurance?
Another question is that the accused party in Article 95 of the act is: “The insurer of compulsory third party liability,” rather than the “third party.” Therefore, the ministry is unable to request those held responsible for the event be held accountable to the National Health Insurance Act.
Is there any way for the ministry to exercise its right of subrogation according to Article 53 of the insurance law? There are legal disputes, obviously.
Tsai Hung Shen
New Taipei City
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry