After decades of official silence, South Korea is beginning to compensate hundreds of landmine victims maimed by a deadly and dangerously enduring legacy of the Korean War and its Cold War aftermath.
Dwarfed in numerical terms by nations such as Laos and Cambodia where landmines kill or injure hundreds each year, South Korean victims have largely been left to suffer in unrecognized isolation.
At least 1,000 are estimated to have died or been left disabled in recent decades, according to the Peace Sharing Association, a coalition of local anti-landmine civic groups. Among them, nearly 30 have been killed or maimed since 2005.
Illustration: June Hsu
Now, 65 years after the conflict started, a law which came into effect in April is offering some financial support, including compensation payouts, to the injured and to the relatives of those who died.
Lawmaker Han Ki-ho, who championed the bill, said there was a “terrible irony” in South Korea having donated 8.8 billion won (US$8 million) since 1993 to UN campaigns to help landmine victims “and we spent next to nothing to help our own... it doesn’t make any sense,” the former army lieutenant general said.
The military says more than 800,000 mines were planted along the tense border with North Korea during and after the 1950 to 1953 Korean conflict as a defense against infiltration. Activists estimate the number at more than 1 million.
A particularly large number were air-dropped in the 1960s, residents and activists say, as incursion fears surged following the 1962 Cuban missile crisis and a 1968 cross-border mission by North Korean commandos to assassinate then-South Korean president Park Chung-hee.
Many small anti-personnel mines were left unmarked or shifted from their demarcated positions over the years by rain and mudslides, posing a fatal hazard to farmers and children playing in the fields.
Lim Duk-sung was 16 when he stepped on a landmine in 1978 while playing near a river close to his home village of Wondang, about 55km northwest of Seoul, near the border.
The blast blew off his right foot and, after a series of painful surgeries, most of his leg below the knee was amputated.
The medical treatment left his already impoverished family bankrupt, while Lim dropped out of school and has battled depression ever since.
“None of us ever imagined protesting to the military or asking for compensation,” Lim said. “That’s just the way things are here.”
There is no official data on the precise number of landmine victims, with activists saying they were effectively dismissed as necessary collateral in the constant struggle to secure the border against aggression from the North.
Many victims were poor, uneducated farmers or their children, as well as herb-pickers searching the hillsides for medicinal plants. Few have dared to seek compensation.
“They were scared that they would be kicked out of their hometown if they ‘cause trouble,’” said Kim Ki-ho, head of the Korea Research Institute for Mine Clearance.
Once part of a heavily restricted military area, the border villages were reopened in the 1960s, allowing many former residents to return, but they were required to sign a waiver that absolved the military of responsibility for any undefined “accidents” in the future.
Life in the villages has always been colored by the heavy military presence along the fortified border. The army bans farmers growing tall crops to better monitor the border and, in the past, used to require villagers to wear certain color clothes on a given day — making it easier to spot North Korean spies. Land mine warning signs are still common in the area.
Although it stopped laying new mines in 2000, South Korea — like the US, Russia, China and North Korea — has not joined the more than 160 nations to have signed the Ottawa Treaty banning the use or production of anti-personnel mines.
When the US — South Korea’s key military ally — declared last year that it was halting the use of all anti-personnel mines, it made an exception for the inter-Korean border, citing the area’s “unique challenges.”
Lawmaker Han agrees, arguing that landmines remain a crucial defense tool given that the two Koreas remain technically at war after the Korean conflict ended with a ceasefire instead of a peace treaty.
“I think we will be able to remove those mines once the two Koreas reunify,” he said.
For Lee Tae-ui, an 81-year-old farmer in the village of Wondang, the fate of the mines is all a bit academic.
Lee was eking out a living as a part-time scrap metal collector in the 1960s when the military offered him work clearing the area around the village of mines. He lost his right foot when he stepped on an unexploded device and received nothing by way of compensation. The financial support being offered by the new bill has come too late to be of any real use to him.
“What’s the point of getting some money after all these years, when I’ll die soon anyway?” he said.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under